Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

14

PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!!! the exponential function, f(x)=2^x

1 answer:

Lady bird [3.3K]2 years ago

6 0

Multiplying function by any number between 0 and 1 exclusive would compress function vertically.

Adding constant value of function would shift function vertically. Negative constant shifts it down

So that would be "It is vertically compressed" and "It is shifted down"

You might be interested in

An office building has the same number and size of offices on each floor. If there are 21 offices on the first 3 floors, then wh

zhenek [66]

Answer:

70 offices

Step-by-step explanation:

21 ÷ 3 to get amount per floor, 7 per floor, 7 × 10 = 70, 70 offices

6 0

1 year ago

I need help....Does anybody know the answer?

Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

8/15 = 8/15

3/5 = 9/15

2/3 = 10/15

11/15 = 11/15

We see that the pattern is that the terms increase by 1/15 as they move up.

Thus, the next term in the sequence is 12/15, which can be simplified to 4/5.

Let me know if this helps!

3 0

2 years ago

A test contains eight true/false questions. Assuming you attempt each question, in how many different ways could you answer the

Umnica [9.8K]

multiplication , addition, subtraction, division

5 0

3 years ago

Could somebody help me im slow sorry

Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

I'd say multiply the numerators then the denominators and at the end simplify at least thats how I multiply fractions :)

8 0

2 years ago

trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

See explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

The given complex number are:

$z_1=-3\sqrt{3}+3i$

and

$z_2=6\cos 150\degree+6i\sin 150\degree$

When we rewrite $z_1=-3\sqrt{3}+3i$ in complex form, we obtain;

$z_1=r(\cos \theta+i\sin \theta)$

where

$r=\sqrt{(-3\sqrt{3})^2+3^2 }=\sqrt{36}=6$

and

$\theta=tan^{-1}(\frac{y}{x})$

$\implies \theta=tan^{-1}(\frac{-3\sqrt{3}}{3})=150\degree$

Hence,

$z_1=6(\cos 150\degree+i\sin 150\degree)$

$z_1=6\cos 150\degree+6i\sin 150\degree$

Hence

$z_1=z_2$

8 0

2 years ago