Answer:
The answer is sadly Donald Trump But I wish the correct answer would be the picture I circled in red
Explanation:
The statement that contributed most directly to the enactment of the law in the excerpt provided is that the "European demands for laborers in the New World."
This is evident in the fact that Queen Isabella said, "I command you to compel and oblige the said Indians to deal and associate with the Christians of the said island, to work in their buildings in collecting and mining gold and other metals, and to grow food and supplies for the Christian settlers and inhabitants of the said island."
The excerpt was culled from the letter of Queen Isabella to Nicolas de Ovando, governor of Hispaniola, in the year 1503.
During this period, the governor of Hispaniola in the New World sees the need for laborers in New Spain.
Queen Isabella made the Decree on Indian Labor, which approved the forced labor of Native Indians by the Spanish.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that at some point in New World, the Spanish saw the need for laborers to helped them settle in the continent.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/8364655
Answer: most likely Procedural Due Process
Explanation:
and if they dong evidence that he stole u can also file for false accusation which can be used when a claim or allegation of wrongdoing that is untrue and/or otherwise unsupported by facts.
The relationship that the eighth and the fourth amendment have is that they are both amendments that talks about the way that the police have to act with the citizens of the nation.
<h3>What is the fourth amendment?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the amendment of the United States that forbids all forms of unreasonable searches by the police without first getting a warrant from the court of law.
<h3>What is the eight amendment?</h3>
This is the amendment in the nation that forbids all forms of cruel punishments and excessive bail condition on the people by the police form of the United States.
Read more on the amendment here: brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ1
Answer:
breach of the implied of merchantability
Explanation:
Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.
