11.68 $ a month, i believe thats the answer, if not its pretty close...
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following 4 images.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in the following 4 images.
Answer:
Oral Employment Contract
We shall assume that Schwartz Inc. changed its mind some period before the May 2021 Johnny's graduation date.
We can argue that the contract is voidable by Schwartz because it was an oral contract. The protections accorded a written contract are missing. And the conditions for voiding the contract are not clearly enumerated as in a written contract.
The contract duration favors Johnny more than Schartz, Inc. because it is for a year and no more.
Therefore, since the employment contract is for a year, it is legally enforceable by Johnny.
Explanation:
But if Schwartz were to void the contract in May 2021 when no opportunity would be given to Johnny to enter into another contract immediately, we could conclude that to void the contract was unconscionable. Contracts are not voidable with a change of mind, most especially if the other party would suffer some damages as result. Contracts require legal reasons for voiding them.
Answer:
Dispatch/Deployment
Explanation:
Dispatch/Deployment is the 11th management characteristic of NIMS and relates to when <u>resources should be deployed only when requested or when dispatched by an appropriate authority</u> through established resource management systems.
In the scenario we see that the supervisor directed the staff to checkout only when requested, secondly <u>he did so with an appropriate authority</u> because his own boss - the American Red Cross Disaster Operations Supervisor <u>has directed you to begin re-assigning shelter staff personnel</u>
