Hey there!
<span>In what organizational pattern do you compare and contrast subjects as a whole?
You would have to (compare/contrast) them using the method of the </span><span>
subject-by-subject organization method. Sense you are comparing them by using subjects, they would have to be using the
(subject-by-subject) method because they are using subjects.
For example: If I were to go fishing, would I get a bag of Doritos?
No, I would get a Fishing pole, and some hooks, right?
It's the same in this case,we would want to use the
(subject-by-subject) method because, they are using subject's to compare them.
Your correct answer would be
. . .
</span>

<span>
Hope this helps you!
~Jurgen</span>
<em>I'm</em><em> </em><em>not</em><em> </em><em>sure</em><em> </em><em>what's</em><em> </em><em>wrong</em><em> </em><em>with</em><em> </em><em>my</em><em> </em><em>computer</em><em> </em><em>-</em><em>-</em><em> </em><em>it's</em><em> </em><em>starting</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>beep,</em><em>it's</em><em> </em><em>getting</em><em> </em><em>slower</em><em>,</em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>it's</em><em> </em><em>getting</em><em> </em><em>really</em><em> </em><em>warm</em>
The correct answer is "Ordinary people can act heroically in chaotic situations".
Explanation: In "The Great Fire", the narrator explains White's testimony of the Great Chicago fire; there were accounts of men taking advantage of the situation and overcharging services for people in distress, but in other instances, there were regular people who helped for free. The everyday people who chose to help without expecting anything in return were the true heroes.
The reader and the bandaged man know the he's invisible
Everyone else does not