Answer:
Explanation:
This question is really hard to make out. Leave out all the comments that don't matter or don't make sense when you read it over.
Those that were in New England in the 1600s were of one mind about what religion was. Therefore it made sense for them to choose a government that reflected their individual religious beliefs.
The answer is this one.
Religion was the basis for government as
well as private life.
Ummm don't under stand it at all like what grade is this I don't think I ever had this before?!?
I took the quiz this is the answer :
If the lineal descendants of Ham are alone to be scripturally enslaved, it is certain that slavery at the south unscriptural;... (and so on)
I found out that means let my hands speak for me and stabs ceaser idk
Answer:
I think he´s (partly) right
Explanation:
Partly right because yes, colleges are flooded with individuals who seem to be out of place and not learning anything that they could have learned outside the school building. Murray´s essay follows quite clearly the opinion of Noam Chomsky. The strategical creation of a separated American class system is a daring theory that needs some (personal) coments because of its elitist element, i.e. we who study have (keep) the power.
Two examples:
México is a democracy in name where the powerful and rich people send their kids - no matter how stupid they are - to college schools and private universities that only exist as the entry door to a well-paid job. And even if you don´t go to university you can always buy your degree, as former president Fox did.
Germany is a real democracy that has a social education system. It is costly but the economic support (bafug in German) for students is based on how much your parents earn. If your parents are poor you get more money per month to study and vice versa.
Now kindly look at the American educational system and see if it resembles more the Mexican or the German system.
