Answer:
An argumentative tutorial that argues for or against young people’s ability to initiate positive change in their communities.
Explanation:
YOUNG PEOPLE AND THEIR ABILITY TO INITIATE POSITIVE CHANGE IN THEIR COMMUNITIES.
The question on whether young people can be able to initiate positive change in their communities has been here for a while. I cannot vote for or against it.
Young people can or cannot be able to initiate positive change in their communities based on different factors which include: attitude, literacy levels, influence, environment and much more.
The environment young people find themselves in might either influence or discourage their positive addition to the community, for instance, a young person in an abusive environment who is neglected cannot have time to think positively about his contribution to the community, he might be involved in actions which otherwise harm the society to fill the gap of his needs.
Young people are generally rebellious and shall always feel pushed to the wall to behave in a certain manner, due to this they always seem negative in their contribution to their community but the truth of the matter is that young people who have been given a culture of positivity and are shown exclusivity in the community shall always have positive contributions to make to their community.
For this, I'll just say you chose "word watcher". I think I read maybe the first few chapters in this book last year. This book was actually quite confusing to me. I guess it was just the names that threw me off. Here is a sample off what you can say:
There are many details from this story that are worthy to share in a literary discussion. For this story, I chose word watcher as my character role. Using my role, I would discuss the different names and their meanings for a literary discussion. In the story, the author used different names. For example, the main character's name was "moon shadow lee". My reading role greatly helped me better understand the story. Rather than skimming through the book, I was able to slow down and recognize the different words and names the author uses. For example, the main characters father, "wind rider" was a kit maker. "wind rider" was a good name for him, because it really described, what he does and aspires to do. <span />
Unclear question. However, I inferred you are referring to story "Julius Caeser" by Shakespeare.
Answer:
<u>He rejected the proposal initially</u>.
Explanation:
Remember that Cassius was among the conspirators who wanted <em>Caeser</em> dead.
So he tried persuade Brutus to join them in their plot to kill Ceaser. However, after the conversation Brutus wasn't affected to join them at that moment.
They stopped placing emphasis on the decline of mortality because it fails to explain all the aspects of the problem. Sure, it is one of the reasons, but it can't provide the full picture. There are two alternative models: cultural influence, and economic and investment. Both of those models include education, as it strongly influences cultural models and improves chances of economic progress.
It is important to note that all of these models (decline in mortality, cultural influence, economic and investment) are partial and complementary: they should function together, as each of them explains only one aspect of the phenomenon.
Answer:
A story about a doctor who tracks and treats the outbreak of a virus.
Explanation:
This is the most likely answer to the question. In this passage, we see that the doctor and the reporter are talking about the likelihood of an epidemic. The doctor states that the prevalence of international travel makes pandemics more likely. Therefore, the story that we decide to write has to be related in some way to epidemics and the impact that international travel has on them. Option B is the one that would best address these concerns.
