The most sensible answer is to:
A) Report his findings.
As a scientist it is his job to conduct experiments based on hypothesis or theories and from this experiments, give a detailed description, explanation, and conclusion about the experiment. This is the reason scientists and doctors write articles about their research, to make the public aware of such discoveries so that future researchers don't have to spend time valuable time and further studies can be based on such experimental report.
D) Would also be correct 'If' the scientist didn't find the expected answer to his hypothesis. This would cause the scientist to perform further experiments to find a reasonable justification and give a conclusion about it. If by the end of his studies, the research concludes that his hypothesis is incorrect, he must change his hypothesis based on scientific truth.
Both B) and C) are the least likely answers because:
B) is an immature action to take, showing the scientists lack of control. Throwing away experiment notes is not the wisest move to take as these notes not only provide valuable information about the experiment but can actually prove to be important data, that if analysed well it could show the scientist his mistake/error, a new unobseved pattern or give him a new hypothesis or idea. Thus proving to be very valuable.
C) As a scientist, it is his right to be a very genuine about his work as he is given a credibility by science. Lie is one of the greatest sin to a scientist as it causes his credibility to collapse and even lose his title as a scientist.
Answer: 15 and 16
Explanation:
You can set up an equation N is one positive integer, and N+1 is the second (because they are consecutive, so it's the first number plus one).
Equation to solve for N
N(N+1) = N + (N+1) + 209
N^2 + N = 2N +1 + 209
N^2 - N - 210 = 0 (factor here)
N = 15 or N = -14
Since the question asks for the positive integers, you know the first number is 15, then the next would be 16.
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer: the second one, aan article from www.europeanhistory.net that was updated in 2008.
i’d say an article in the Journal of European History
This source isn't very recent (but it doesnt need to be because Amaya is writing about the history of Europe), but we do know that it was updated, which implies that more relevent information was posted. The information is coming from a trustworthy source (we know this because of the url the article is from), so is likely very relevent and relaible. The last source is irrelevent becasue it's abput a carmaker who had/has nothing to do with the Columbian Exchange, and the first source is from a journal (we don't know who the journal belongs to, or what kind of information is in it).
Fill weight of capsules equals tap bulk density of material multiplied by capsule volume. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a capsule machine?</h3>
Generally, Filling empty capsules with medicinal contents is done by using a Capsule Filler machine. Capsule fillers used in large-scale pharmaceutical production are very efficient.
In conclusion, Volume x Tapped bulk density = Capsule fill weight
Read more about capsule machine
brainly.com/question/13020190
#SPJ1
