Answer:
Proud
Explanation:
In this paragraph Muir talks about how despite being in a difficult situation, he had nature and the beauty of the Calypso to get him through it even when he was without food and shelter he found he didn't need it. He welcomes everything nature has to offer both the beauty and the storms. He uses words like "abounding inexhaustible spirtual beauty bread" which alludes to his naturalism philosophy. And he mentions that he feels "free as the winds" when he is out in nature.
Answer:
How dogs communicate with humans
Explanation:
A foil is the near complete opposite of the main character (whichever character they want you to find a foil for).
Rainsford and Whitney were good hunting friends with numerous similar interests. They could not be foils because of how close in similarity they were. Even when they disagreed on how animals felt about being hunted, Whitney seemed open to and intrigued by Rainsford's points and way of thinking.
Ivan is a near irrelevant character, being a mere Cossack who follows whatever General Zaroff says. He is mindless and has almost zero traits to even compare to Rainsford, let alone any traits aside from a mindless follower to begin with.
The answer would be General Zaroff. This is almost like the cliche protagonist vs antagonist foil. Both of them are hunters, but different kinds. Zaroff got bored with animals and wanted to hunt human people instead, whereas Rainsford had enjoyed the thrill of an animal hunt and thinks that the hunting of people is murder. Zaroff is more heartless and cold, a killer, if you will. Rainsford seems to think highly of actual people, and had no interest in playing Zaroff's game.
Answer:
it is not personification because the fly would have human features an dact like a human and talk and things like that that is what personification is hope this helps
Explanation:
