Answer:
The correct response is Option B: Judicial review is the ability of the Supreme Court to look over a law and determine if it meets the requirements of the Constitution.
Explanation:
One of the roles of the U.S. Supreme Court is judicial review. It is an important dimension of the separation of powers concept in which the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the government all serve as checks and balances for each other. The Supreme Court has the last word when it comes to deciding if a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated by something like a state or federal law that is passed by the state government or the House or Senate in the case of federal law.
Answer:
Different people define culture in different ways, for example “Culture: learned and shared human patterns or models for living; day- to-day living patterns, these patterns and models pervade all aspects of human social interaction. Culture is mankind’s primary adaptive mechanism”1. Another author says that “Culture is the collective programming of the mind which distinguishes the members of one category of people from another.”2. from these definitions it is clear that both explains the same idea but in different words, says that culture is first learned after learning it is then shared so it’s a common fact that the younger first learn the culture from their elders and when these young become elders they transfer it to the next generation. But the culture learned it includes all the aspects of human interaction and thus it become the mankind’s adoptive mechanism.
<em><u>hope it helps ☺️✌️</u></em>
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Hey there,
<span>Without </span>directions, and the ability to obey given instructions<span>, many unnecessary or unwarranted side effects may occur.
</span>
Hope this helps :))
<em>~Top</em>
Maybe expelling the Christians ;). But if we look at it seriously, people should learn to adapt and live with each other, without thinking that someone is under their level, not worrh the citizenship etc.
I hope this helps!
