Twenty-year-olds would most likely outperform 60-year-olds on an art history exam in which they were asked to: A. list as many famous artists as possible.
<h3>How Twenty-year-olds would most likely outperform 60-year-olds </h3>
A twenty year olds can tend to perform better than a 60 years old when writing an history examination.
The reason is that a twenty year olds student can remember and as well list famous artist due to the student cognitive ability compare to the 60 years old because people cognitive ability decline as they aged.
Therefore the correct option is A.
Learn more about Cognitive ability here:brainly.com/question/6874613
#SPJ12
<span>The series of 4 acts (plus the Quebec Act), which are
infamously known as the Intolerable Acts, or Coercive Acts, were passed by the
British Parliament in 1774 and 1775, as the response to the Boston Tea party
event, in which the colonists threw a large shipment of tea into Boston harbor.
The acts were: the Massachusetts Government Act, the Administration of Justice
Act, the Boston Port Act, and the Quartering Act of 1774. The reason why these
acts were perceived as intolerable was because they took away Massachusetts'
self-governing and historic rights, which caused the outrage in the colonies.
The acts were one of the main triggers of the American Revolution in 1775. They
were perceived as a violation of colonists' constitutional rights, their
natural rights, and their colonial charters. The citizens of Boston saw the
acts as unnecesary and cruel punishment, and in the rest of British America,
they were seen as a threat to the liberties of the Thirteen Colonies. It is for
this reason that colonists in other colonies decided to support Massachusetts
in case of an attack, which resulted in the American Revolution, and the
independence of the United States of America.</span>
A. Informational influence
Answer:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Summary:
a person cannot be “deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law."
Example:
anyone accused of a crime can expect to go through a set procedure and therefore has a right to due process.
