The correct answer is <span>anti-social personality disorder.
Anti-social personality disorder (APD) is characterized by little or no regard towards morals, ethics and what it is right and wrong, no regard for others' well being and feelings, and ignoring the values and laws of society. Such individuals are manipulative, glib and are often referred to as sociopaths. It is common for individuals with APD to break the law and engage in criminal activity. </span>
The correct answer when you are doing this practice is that you are applying the FIT concepts to make an assignment. Metacognition is when you are actively engaging in cognitive processes and you plan to approach tasks by carefully monitoring and evaluating your progress to complete it.
Supreme Court Justices are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Once they are approved, they have lifetime terms.
I agree, and believe anyone would agree, with the quote. Getting a Supreme Court Justice nominated and approved, who shares your political views, means that you will have a very powerful person in the Judicial Branch exercising power for potentially several decades. Supreme Court Justices, especially through the power of judicial review, can exercise great power over the government without having to worry about reelection and with no end to their term. This means that the president, by extension, enjoys great influence over government through his nomination of these justices.
Answer:
A comment by the president attached to a vetoed bill giving recommendations to Congress
Explanation:
The President of the United States can promote some of the political agendas by signing statements.
A signing statement when used in connections to the Congress can be --
When President after rejecting a bill passed by the Congress leaves a comment on the bill and recommends the Congress to change some of its nature of the bill by signing the bill and returning it to the Congress.
Thus the answer is ----
A comment by the president attached to a vetoed bill giving recommendations to Congress
Answer:
If prithviraj had killed ghori in the first battle, there would be no need for a second battle where prithviraj would be defeated.
Explanation:
Although Prithviraj emerged victorious in the first battle, he proved to be an extremely arrogant and superb character, allowing Ghori to stay alive, even though he knew it could have dire consequences. This decision by Prithviraj was senseless and caused the need for a second battle where he was defeated, also because of his arrogance, allowing Ghori to continue his plans.
