1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dedylja [7]
2 years ago
5

The principle of fairness that laws are based upon

Law
1 answer:
Charra [1.4K]2 years ago
5 0
Habeas corpus is the answer
You might be interested in
How would you react if an individual you were interviewing voluntarily revealed forbidden information?
Elanso [62]

Explanation:

Although the material is banned, I will keep the person in abeyance unless there is any proof against his allegations. Even if nothing is confirmed, picking such a person who is a compulsive liar would be in my own choice. I can not endanger my company and its workers by recruiting an employee who may be off - the-record suspect, if the offense is not confirmed. I comprehend that it is not legitimate to act on the prohibited information, but an act of a non-social nature is equally a ban on society, and I, as a recruiter, can not promote the same thing.

6 0
3 years ago
Why should political parties have intra party elections
iVinArrow [24]

Answer:

To pick the best canidate/ representative to be the face of the political party

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement regarding case law is true?
Vesna [10]
Bchfbxbdhdh shroud dbdue she did did d work for her birthday today she was still there but I was just asking if she could go with her and
8 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
Which policy could be used to increase energy efficiency across the electric sector?
7nadin3 [17]

The policies proposed here can be used to increase energy efficiency in the electricity sector. Thus, Option D is the correct statement.

<h3>How to utilize energy effectively?</h3>

Efficient power use, on occasion honestly referred to as power efficiency, is the purpose to lessen the quantity of energy required to offer services and products and also can lessen outcomes of air pollution.

Hence, Option D is the correct statement that all the policies mentioned here for the purpose of energy efficiency can be utilized.

Learn more about energy efficiency here:

brainly.com/question/14280607

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • When there is flooding and you see pooled water, what should you do?
    15·1 answer
  • In assessing the tort of defamation, the courts must seek a balance between the right to protect one's reputation with the right
    8·1 answer
  • The penalties for a person's third DUI conviction include imprisonment for
    12·1 answer
  • Why do civilians in the United States, Great Britain, or France join terrorist groups and agree to fight against their own count
    13·1 answer
  • What kind of report will begin the investigation of criminal matters? *
    10·1 answer
  • Your school district has debated the issue of allowing vending machines in schools. Some teachers say that children need to eat
    11·2 answers
  • Identify two reasons why you agree or disagree with structural functionalism<br><br> -Sociology
    10·1 answer
  • What does it mean for a law to be unconstitutional
    5·1 answer
  • A. Explain right-of-way rules for navigating a roundabout.
    8·2 answers
  • State a proposition of policy and demonstrate
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!