Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, I do believe that the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights. Though the wording of the sentence above may sound like I'm saying I believe the government is allowed to control people, that's the last thing I mean. People need rules and structure which is what the government provides. Imagine if there <em>wasn't</em> a government. There would be no soical order because people will have too much power and some will not use their civil liberties responsibly. I understand both sides, but overall, I do think the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights.
Answer: C
Explanation:
High Plains. I’m also struggling through virtual so I thought I could give an answer after I’ve already used Brainly for half my school work.
Answer:
D. On Earth.
Explanation:
The book of Revelation is the last of the holy books of the Bible. In this book, the Apostle John gave a revelation of what is to come after the end of the world, the "rupture'.
Chapter 21 verse 1-2 says
<em>1 "Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth,” for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. </em>
<em>2 I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband".</em>
The "new Jerusalem" which John described in these passages where God dwells with human beings on the new Earth forever.
Answer:
Direct power over citizens
A good side of the short term is that those who
are representing will have more focus on the work they are responsible for and
will not lose motivation. Another aspect I that with the shorter term more
people will have the opportunity to participate in administration bringing out
new ideas and innovations competing and trying to show the best in the time. A
negative side is that sometime someone can commit mistake which they want to
rectify but cannot due to short term which can be a plus point for long term.
