Answer:
Should more populous states receive greater representation?
Explanation:
During this time, the states with the largest populations thought it was unfair that they got the same amount of votes as states with smaller populations when they had more people. The smaller population states liked this arrangement however because obviously, they didn't want less votes than the states with larger population.
Because of this, controversy ensued lol
Republic
,Hope this helps
The Queen is covered by what is known as sovereign immunity in the UK. It means that the sovereign cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from civil or criminal proceedings. ... The law also states that no arrests can be made in the monarch's presence, or within the surroundings of a royal palace
Nowadays, the Queen in her personal capacity is considered for legal purposes the Crown as Sovereign and as such immune to prosecution. ... That's the same as other heads of state, at least during their terms of office - and the Queen holds her office for life
Hello there,
The answer would be b, the government seized private property. The were forced expropriation of private property including businesses and land owned by their rightful owners.
They get 2 senators per state
