Answer:
monarchy, aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, theocracy and tyranny.
Explanation:
Answer:
Dear pupils of the future ,
I am writing this letter to know the new ways and tactics you use to learn and how it better your studying skills
Right now in my times for studying the latest way to study is by using electronics like phone ,tablets and computers. In this moments I feel very good and i like the way studies are improving .
I included some electronics like the phones and computers because those are the best ways to study right now ,for example ,the computers help u get far more information than on phones and on tablets ,on phones you get better study skills and on tablets you can play brain games alot.
My best wish for you pupils of the future is that ,you people get an eccelent school day and get better objects or electronics for studying
Explanation:
According to elm more long-lasting changes in audience perspectives occur if listeners process the speech message "centrally."
<h3>What is ELM?</h3>
ELM stands for elaboration likelihood model.
The dual process theory known as the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) of persuasion describes how attitudes change. Richard E. Petty and John Cacioppo created the ELM in 1980. The model seeks to clarify various methods of processing stimuli, their uses, and the effects they have on attitude change. The center route and the periphery route are the two main paths for persuasion suggested by the ELM.
The genuine qualities of the data offered in favor of an argument will probably be carefully and thoughtfully considered by a person under the central pathway, leading to persuasion. The central route requires a high degree of message elaboration in which the person receiving the message generates a significant amount of cognition about the arguments. The effects of changing one's attitude will be reasonably long-lasting, resilient, and behavior-predictive.
On the other hand, under the peripheral approach, persuasion happens when someone associates with favorable or unfavorable cues in the stimulus or makes a straightforward assumption about the merits of the stance that is being promoted. The cues that the person receives via the peripheral channel are typically unrelated to the stimuli' logical quality. These indications will be related to things like the message's production value, the message's sources' attractiveness or legitimacy, or both. The chance of elaboration will depend on a person's drive and capacity to assess the argument being made.
To learn more about elaboration likelihood model (ELM) with the help of given link:
brainly.com/question/15827409
#SPJ4
Well since the person is obviously having a hard time trying to put the puzzle together so I would say unpleasant
