Answer:
224
Step-by-step explanation:
- in a cylinder the only sides that would actually count is the top and bottom
- you would multiply the top and bottom.
- 14 x 16 = 224
- if I'm wrong let me know
Answer:
2. The change in expected height for every one additional centimeter of femur length.
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>1. The expected height for someone with a femur length of 65 centimeters.</u>
<em>Doesn't make sense, that would be height value when centimeters = 65.</em>
<u>2</u><u><em>. </em></u><u>The change in expected height for every one additional centimeter of femur length.</u>
<em>Makes sense, for every increase in one additional centimeter, we can expect the height to be proportional to the slope.</em>
<u>3. The femur length for someone with an expected height of 2.5 centimeters.</u>
<em>Doesn't make sense, the linear relationship relies on the femur length to get the height.</em>
<u>4. The change in expected femur length for every one additional centimeter of height.</u>
<em>Doesn't make sense, again, the linear relationship relies on the femur length.</em>
Answer: Ernie has $750 and Bert has 
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the amount that Ernie has be 'x'.
Let the amount that Bert has be 
Amount lost by Ernie = $225
Amount gained by Bert = $675
According to question, we get that
Hence, Ernie has $750 and Bert has
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: u = 9.5hrs
Alternative: u =/ 9.5hrs
Using the t test
t = x-u/sd/√n
Where x is 10hrs, u is 9.5, sd is 1.6 and n is 15
t = 10-9.5 / (1.6/√15)
t = 0.5 / (0.4131)
t = 1.21
In order to make a conclusion, we have to find the p value at a significance level lot 0.1. The p value is 0.2263 which is greater than 0.1. This, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough statistical evidence to prove that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
24.26 multiply by 37 = 897.62mm (89.762cm)
