A credible peer-review source is from a source that isn't biased, or is not related to you. It is best to find someone who isn't one of your friends. Since they are credible, the source should be verified that they know what they are talking about as well. I hope this makes sense.
Fiction:<em> </em>A tiger, a lion, or any strong animal will judge us the most. In their eyes, humans would be weak and small. "Our children grow just a bit and then they're on their own. Most humans don't live in packs-we might. Our lionesses and tigers will hunt small things down-just because they all our weak." Says the strong animals. "That baby human is <em>crawling </em>while the others walk on their two! It's so silly!"
Maybe Truth: A tiger, a lion, or any strong animal will judge us the most. In their eyes, humans would be weak and small. They think their children are smarter, stronger, and better. Some will live in packs, like wolves or hyenas. Because of this, they find food from smaller animals. In their language, they might tease us- because of the baby's cry, because of the children's immature-ness, because of the adult's forgetting-ness...
Brainliest?
Every press release consists of these points (paragraphs) and always organized in sequence: Headline > Location (City,State/Country) with date(Month,day, year) > Body(plot) > Company/organization info > Contact Information > Ending.