Answer:
582=-28-2287u272y7329=7373+272387##82838-78338=&*27882029··⇔㏒㏑∞°²³¥378c730+8383749=0891829.9279739383/03980339.83883383383)73837
Step-by-step explanation:
9(-2)+x=-8
And x would be positive 26
Answer:
.6 or 1.5
Step-by-step explanation:
change it to decmail
P=2(L+W)
l=x+7
w=x
P=2(x+7+x)
P=2(2x+7)
P=4x+14
hast to be greater than 154
P>154
4x+14>154
minus 14 both sides
4x>140
divide 4
x>35
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
