1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
9966 [12]
3 years ago
13

Explain the Chinese Exclusion Act and how it impacted new immigrants.

History
1 answer:
nordsb [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The act also affected the Chinese who had already settled in the United States. Any Chinese who left the United States had to obtain certifications for reentry, and the Act made Chinese immigrants permanent aliens by excluding them from U.S. citizenship.

Nicknames: Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882

Enacted by: the 47th United States Congress

Effective: May 6, 1882

Acts repealed: Dec 17, 1943

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Check all that apply.
evablogger [386]

Answer:

  • The Soviet Union wanted to gain access to build bases on warm-water ports (ports that do not freeze over in the winter) for easy access to the ocean.
  • The Soviet Union wanted to gain new territory for expansion of communism throughout the world.
  • The Soviet Union desired to increase its influence by surrounding itself with satellite nations that could prove beneficial for military and economic gain.

Explanation:

The Soviet Union had a lot of land mass that bordered the Arctic ocean and other areas in the Soviet Union were quite cold as well which led the Soviets to desire a warm water port that they could use to access the ocean more effectively.

The also wanted to spread communism around the world and so desired territory to do so.

Finally, the Soviet Union wanted to increase its influence so it surrounded itself with Satellite states such as those in the Warsaw Pact and Soviets in the Soviet Union.

3 0
3 years ago
In what way does the judicial branch check the powers of the executive branch?
Aleks04 [339]

The correct answer is D) it can declare presidential actions unconstitutional.

<em>The Judicial branch checks the powers of the executive branch in that it can declare presidential actions unconstitutional. </em>

In order to eliminate the possibility that one power had more faculties and could control the other two, the United States Constitution created a doctrine of System of Separation of Powers and a Check and Balance System. This way, the Constitution defines clearly the power of the Executive branch (the Presidency), the Legislative branch (the Congress), and the Judicial branch (the Supreme Court). In the case of the question, the Judicial branch checks the powers of the executive branch in that it can declare presidential actions unconstitutional.

3 0
4 years ago
Should the U.S require half of its government to be female?
grandymaker [24]

Answer:

yes obviously

haha

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you agree or disagree w/ Cortes decision to burn the ships? Explain
Nataliya [291]

Hernan Cortes (1485-1547) was a Spanish colonizer and conqueror, who leaded the conquest of the Mexican territories, that started in 1519 with the occupation of Veracruz. The tales about the sacking of the Mexican capital, Tenochtitlan, are still legendary nowadays.

After the takeover of Veracruz, Cortes gave the order of sinking his own ships (it was thought they were burnt, but nowadays that hypothesis is being questioned). Anyway, he destroyed his ships on purpouse to force his men to go forward and conquer the New World, both in the militar and spiritual (goal of spreading the Christian religion) dimensions.

  • Agreement with his decision: of course it is an incredibly effective manner of ensuring that his men would be motivated to conquer the territory, mainly because they did not have an alternative choice. They had to become rulers there or be lost in the middle of unknown lands. It can be claimed how the ultimate goal justifies the means.
  • Disagreement with the decision: it can be argued how unethical is that he prevented his men from deciding if they wanted to participate or not on the mission. He eliminated the choice.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the significance of the landmark Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson?
Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How do you think Dorothea Dix work benefits people today
    8·1 answer
  • Explain the negative impact of government subsidies for railroads (AP U.S. History)
    14·1 answer
  • African Americans returning from service in World War I found that _____. Select the best answer from the choices provided. A. t
    15·2 answers
  • The result of the Battle of Bunker Hill was a/an
    7·1 answer
  • What three departments did congress establish in the executive branch of the government?
    15·2 answers
  • PLSSSSSSS HELPPPPPPP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!PLSSSSSSS HELPPPPPPP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTTTTTTTTTT!!!
    6·2 answers
  • William T. Sherman's March to the Sea can best be described as
    8·1 answer
  • 40 points
    13·2 answers
  • This is for my sister pls help her Tom is an Inuit living in the northern Canadian territory of Nunavut. Which climate is he lik
    6·2 answers
  • Did benjamin franklin sign the declaration of independence.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!