Answer:
C. a well-told story should have no need for subsequent discussion
Explanation:
When a person tells a story in a presentation, it is false that a well-told story should not have need for further discussions.
No matter how good a story is or how well it is explained, there should always be room for further discussion, either in form of asking questions for clarity or discussing some points in the story.
It is important because the sources tell you whether the article was credible. When you have an article that has bad source, you are running the risk of having, wrong, opinionated data. This can discredit you paper if you use it.
An analogy is a comparison between two things.
The only answer comparing a thing to another is the first answer. The rest of the answers are stating facts/opinions.
