Answer:Cities with warmer temperatures than the natural environments that surround them are called urban heat islands. Man-made materials such as pavement warm up quickly during the day. These surfaces radiate heat, causing air temperatures around the city to rise. Even after the sun sets each day, the surfaces hold onto their heat, making it more difficult for the temperature in the city to decrease. Urban heat islands can have a negative impact on the environment and on the people residing in affected cities.This is harmful to the health of the people that live in the city. Increased electricity usage is also associated with urban heat islands because people need more air conditioning and cooling due to the higher temperatures. Solutions to the heat effect issue center around ideas that would reduce city temperatures, such as heat-reflecting roofs, more green spaces, and the use of cool-pavement materials.
Explanation: i got 100 hundred percent so this was my answer
Answer: a. The judiciary branch trying to hold a congressperson accountable if they overstep their role by meeting foreign leaders in an official diplomatic capacity to reverse US foreign policy.
Explanation: One important principle embodied in the U.S. Constitution is separation of powers.
If there are checks and balances, the branches of government can limit the powers of the others and no one branch will become too powerful over other branches. Checks and balances makes sure that the power is balanced between the branches of government.
The Executive Branch of government checks on Legislative by having the capability to veto bills. By rejection of appointments, the legislative Branch of government can put checks on the executive Branch. The legislative branch checks on Judicial by having the capacity to impeach the Supreme Court Justices.
Judicial Branch of government is the most powerful of all the branches. The Judicial Branch has the power to declare the acts of the congress and the executive branch of government un-constitutional.
Overstepping boundaries is unconstitutional in the US branches of government.
Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
