Answer: B. No. Imposing a price control below the equilibrium price in a market causes the quantity of the good available to consumers to fall because sellers will supply a smaller quantity, thereby causing some consumers to go without food that they would have been able to buy in the absence of the price control.
Explanation:
If price controls are introduced below the equilibrium price in the market, farmers or sellers will supply less to the market because they will not be incentivized to produce more seeing as they are not making what they should be making.
This, coupled with increased demand on account of food being cheaper, will lead to shortages which would mean that those that could have been able to afford the food at the equilibrium price would not be able to access food leading to even worse food shortages.
Answer:
B.stays with you for life.
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.
<span>in the long run we would expect this tax cut to </span>C. increase the level of real GDP.
Tax cut will give the private sectors more resources to either increase the number of employees or buy materials for production.
Either decision will lead to an increase in overall productivity which will contribute to additional Gross Domestic Products.
