Answer:
b. prohibited any merger that would reduce competition
Explanation:
The "Clayton Act" of <em>1914</em> was meant to prohibit "price-fixing," monopolies and other unethical practices when it comes to business. So, this makes <u>choice a incorrect</u> because it "prohibits the restraint" of such practices. This also makes<u> choice c incorrect</u> because Clayton Act allowed the activity of charging buyers different prices in order to increase competition. This also makes<u> choice e incorrect</u> because the act was meant to provide the firms the freedom to buy their stocks from anyone (even from competitors).
<u>Letter d is incorrect</u> because the "Federal Trade Commission" enforced the "Clayton Act" and not vice-versa.
<u>Choice b is correct</u> because<em> the act prohibited any collusion or merger that would attempt to reduce the competition.</em> The act was meant to increase competition and not on its reduction.
So, this explains the answer.
A SWOT analysis can contribute to the strategic planning process by evaluating all of these.
Answer:
A) production is determined by the interaction of supply and demand.
Explanation:
A pure market economy is an economy where production decisions are made by the forces of demand and supply. there is no intervention of the government in production decisions
Characteristics of a pure market economy
- Private ownership of means of production
- freedom of choice. Producers are free to produce what they desire
- competition among producers
- no government intervention.
Answer:
Public relations
Explanation:
Public relations -
It is the method to spread within an organisation or in society , is referred to as public relations.
The act can be done by an individual or organisation , expect in that particular field .
This method is adapted in order to freely advertise or publicize the goods or service .
Hence, from the given scenario of the question,
the correct term is public relations.
Answer:
$120.38 million or $120 million
Explanation:
Year 2018
Timing difference resulting into liability for the year 2018:
= Total sales - sales in 2018
= $663 - $74
= $589 million
Therefore,
Deferred tax liability:
= Timing difference resulting into liability for the year 2018 × Income tax rate
= $589 million × 0.26
= $153.14 million
Year 2019
Brought forward Timing difference resulting into liability = $589 million
Timing difference resulting into asset for the year 2019 = 126 million
Therefore,
Balance timing difference resulting into liability = $589 - $126
= $463 million
Thus,
Deferred tax liability for the year 2019 = $463 × 0.26
= $120.38 million or $120 million