Answer:
Thriller literature and film also uses settings to build suspense, since the main characteristic of a thriller is precisely the fact that it builds suspense.
Explanation:
Almost anything can work to build suspense, but common settings are: dark forest, desolated or abandoned villages, even large gothic houses.
Both thrillers and Gothic literature are similar in the sense that they try to build suspense and generally deal with dark subject matter. They are different in that Gothic literature has a much more specific aesthetic, while thrillers are more broad aesthetically speaking, and overlapp with other genres as well.
Out of that list, the one that was not a social problem the United States faced at the end of the Civil War was C. anger over women gaining the right to vote because women did <em>not </em>gain the right to vote following the Civil War - that would not occur until the 19th Amendment (women's suffrage) at the height of th early 20th century Progressive Movement.
The answer is B. The Marshall Plan was made to lend mainly Germany money post-war, however what the US really wanted to happen was the Germans would take the money to pay back Britain and France who would then in turn pay the US back for aid lenses during the war. Although in the end it resulted in massive inflation in Germany and caused a worldwide economic slump that last for almost a decade because in the end the money wasn't making its way around the circle.
Answer:
Voter participation increased.
Explanation: found it on quizzez
Answer:
The electoral college system was the best solution they chose to democratically elect a president in a way that was both consistent with republican values and with the protections of rights of smaller states.
Explanation:
The Constitution and the new laws in the United States were revolutionary and pioneering by the end of the 18th century. The Founding Fathers could not look at a previous democratic model to find inspiration, because autocracy was the system of government anywhere else. One of the great dilemmas of democracy is how to avoid the tyranny of majorities over minorities. Could they have thought of a better system then? Maybe it was possible in theory, but it was very hard in practice. Besides, the population of the fomer colonies wasn´t as large as it´s today, and there were only 13 states, not 50. They could hardly have envision some outcomes we´ve seen in recent years when some candidates have won the popular vote, but have failed to win key states and electoral votes. They chose what they saw as the best option.
