The concept of Non-Collaboration refers to the certainty that only black people can argue and fight for freedom, since they are the oppressed people and since white people are part of a group of oppressors. This concept is important in relation to overcoming certain forms of oppression, because it allows people who are oppressed by the racist system to have the authority to speak and show what is really harmful and maleficent, since they go through it and have priority in the subject they live and know. In other words, the importance of Non-Collaboration is to give voice to the oppressed, without being interrupted by the oppressor.
The "non-racialist" philosophies of Ubuntun and African socialism do not agree with this concept. This is because both maintain the idea that states that “my existence is connected to the existence of the other”, which means, for them that the anti-racist and freedom debate of black people needs the participation of white people, since they are part of of the oppressive racist system. In short, for Ubuntun and African Socialism both the oppressed and the oppressor need to participate in the process of liberating blacks.
I agree with the principle of Non-Collaboration in parts. I believe that when it comes to talking about racism, black people have priority as they are the people who suffer from it. In this case, I believe that whites have no place to speak and should be silent, listen and understand. However, I believe that racism will only be fought with the participation of whites, since they were the ones who created this system and they are the people who maintain it today, so I think it is important that whites also participate in this debate; as a listener and not as a speaker.
During the Hellenistic age the Greek gods continued to be worshiped
And art began to became more realistic and have mush more emotion
and last literature during that period focused on Something called new comedy
Answer: I’m not sure but I would say c
Btw sorry if wrong
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>Dickens, the novel, which spans action in the cities of London and Paris</em>
Explanation:
In context, which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 1 (reprinted below)? A Tale of Two Cities, the second of only two historical novels written by Charles Dickens, the novel spans action in the cities of London and Paris during the years 1775–1793.
A Tale of Two Cities dates back to the previous century and sets it stories in the beginning of the French Revolution. Paris is embodied as a city where corruption by the political leaders leads revolutionaries to rise up against the powerful but the violence that replaces that corruption is worse. The London of the book is relatively peaceful and quiet in a village of Soho where a loving family was raised by Charles Darnay and Lucie Manette.
Going back to the question
In context, which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 1 (reprinted below)?
Dickens, the novel, which spans action in the cities of London and Paris
will be perfect
Answer: the ban put on people with felony’s
Explanation: I believe it was in Florida that the ban put on people with Felonies was lifted which opened up the voter population
