Answer:
To enforce this promise we need to analyse whether there has been any agreement or contract between Sarah and Odessa and whether the same can be enforced.
Explanation:
In Sarah's case, her offer to gratuitously pay the neighbor for assisting in the house fire is not an enforceable contract. When the neighbor rushed to help in the fire, the offer to pay $1,000 had not yet been extended. When Sarah did extend the offer to pay $1,000, there was no consideration exchanged between both parties. The consideration, putting out the fire, had already occurred without the offer or acceptance of a contract.
Consider an alternate scenario. Sarah's house was on fire, and she could not wait for the fire department. She ran to her neighbor's house, begged for help, and offered $1,000 in exchange for neighbor's assistance. After hearing Sarah's plea, the neighbor agrees to assist in extinguishing the fire. This constitutes a contract; an offer, consideration, and acceptance.
Answer:
A. Jordan specializes in household production, while Chris specializes in marketplace work.
Explanation:
Chris and Jordan both can work for their household. The best way is to achieve maximum utility by using the combination of their skills. Chris can go for household work and Jordan can go for marketplace work. They both can use combination of their specialization to achieve maximum utility.
Answer:
I'm not sure what this question is about, but the concept of the income expenditures model and its components is the following:
In the income (or aggregate) expenditures model, its author (Keynes) established certain assumptions in order to analyze how the economy works as a whole. His assumptions included that investment, government spending and net exports were all independent from income level.
When the economy is at equilibrium, total expenditures (GDP) = income level = consumption + government + investment + net exports
Another important assumptions are:
- marginal propensity to consume (MPC) + marginal propensity to save (MPS) = 1
- consumption = autonomous consumption + [MPC x (total income level - taxes)]
Savings = investment increase when disposable income increases or real GDP increases.
This model is used to explain the relationship between labor and production levels, and how they are affected by the economy's total expenditures. By increasing expenditures, the demand for labor and products/services will increase.
Answer:
$1.64 per share
Explanation:
The computation of Number of Shares for computing Diluted Earning per share is shown below:-
Proceeds expected = 5,300 × $6
= $31,800
No. of Shares re-purchased = $31,800 ÷ $11
= $2,891 (rounded)
Net Effect of Stock Option = 5,300 - $2,891
= 2,409 shares
Number of Shares for computing Diluted Earning per share = Outstanding shares + Net Effect of Stock Option
= 71,105 + 2,409
= 73,514
Diluted earnings per share for the quarter = Net income for the quarter ÷ Number of Shares for computing Diluted Earning per share
= $120,805 ÷ 73,514
= $1.64 per share
So, for computing the Number of Shares for computing Diluted Earning per share we simply applied the above formula.
