Answer: A 2014 Supreme Court decision regarding newspaper censorship
Explanation:
It should be noted that the original source of information which are called the primary source include autobiography, artifact, document, recordings etc. which are created during the period under study.
Regarding the options given, a 2014 Supreme Court decision regarding newspaper censorship is the most credible one to use in an article about limits on freedom of speech in the United States. It gives a true and original description of the topic at hand.
On the other hand, a blog post, a video
podtbon social media or newspaper column advocating limits on free speech doesn't give the original information source as the content could have been manipulated.
Therefore, the correct option is A.
The answer you have selected makes the most sense
Answer:
C
Explanation:
the author is deeming someone who would decline adopting, "selfish and cold-hearted" without any extra info to justify the claim.
Answer:
everyone that sees the previos answer, DONT CLICK THE LIN K
Explanation:
THERE ARE VIRUSES
1. Full of or showing a disposition to challenge, resist, or fight
2. Send (someone) away from a country or place as an official punishment
3. Of a voice) rough and low in pitch.
4. To give a false appearance of : induce as a false impression
5. Thinly dispersed or scattered.
6. Wrap or dress (a body) in a shroud for burial. or, cover or envelop so as to conceal from view.
7. A concentrated artillery bombardment over a wide area.
8. (of animals, especially snakes, or their parts) secreting venom; capable of injecting venom by means of a bite or sting
hope it helps
