Answer:
"His face as pale as the white snow in the early morning" hope this helped
Explanation:
Based on the payoffs and the probabilities given, we can calculate the mean to be <u>0.8 shots made. </u>
<h3>What is the mean?</h3>
The mean in this scenario will be a weighted average of the probabilities that a number of shots will be made.
The mean will be:
<em>= ∑ (Number of shots x Probability of number of shots)</em>
= (0 x 0.36) + (1 x 0.48) + (2 x 0.16)
= 0.8 shots
In conclusion, the mean is 0.8 shots.
Find out more about weighted average at brainly.com/question/18554478.
The value of the <em>definite</em> integral
has an <em>approximate</em> value of 5 units.
<h3>How to estimate the area below the curve by Riemann sum</h3>
A definite integral within a given interval is represented graphically by the net area below the curve. In this question we must estimate the <em>total</em> area of the curve by <em>right</em> Riemann sum. The most accurate approximation is using Riemann sum with trapezoids, whose formula is defined below:
(1)
Where:
- <em>n</em> - Number of subintervals
- <em>a</em> - Lower limit
- <em>b</em> - Upper limit
- <em>i</em> - Subinterval index
If we know that <em>n = 5</em>, <em>a = 0</em> and <em>b = 10</em>, then the area of the curve is approximately:
![A = \left[\frac{10-0}{2\cdot (5)} \right]\cdot [(f(0)+f(2))+(f(2)+f(4))+(f(4)+f(6))+(f(6)+f(8))+(f(8)+f(10))]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cfrac%7B10-0%7D%7B2%5Ccdot%20%285%29%7D%20%5Cright%5D%5Ccdot%20%5B%28f%280%29%2Bf%282%29%29%2B%28f%282%29%2Bf%284%29%29%2B%28f%284%29%2Bf%286%29%29%2B%28f%286%29%2Bf%288%29%29%2B%28f%288%29%2Bf%2810%29%29%5D)



The value of the <em>definite</em> integral
has an <em>approximate</em> value of 5 units. 
<h3>Remarks</h3>
The figure of the function f(x) is missing. We include a simplified version of the image in the picture attached below. In addition, the statement is poorly formatted, correct form is shown below:
<em>Estimate </em>
<em> using five subintervals with the following.</em>
To learn more on Riemann sums, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/21847158
Answer: C. They will have more time to manage his mother's care.
Explanation:
A single income option means that only one of them will be working and only one source of income will be used to maintain all three of them including Daniel's mother. This will most definitely result in them having less disposable income and less financial income in general.
Also the scenario painted made no mention of a baby so option D is incorrect. The most likely option in C which makes sense because with one of them staying home to take care of the mother, they will have time to be able to take care of her better.