1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stels [109]
2 years ago
11

The war between France and Britain (mostly in North America); also on the European continent, with France allied with Austria an

d Britain allied with Prussia: I​
History
2 answers:
Sloan [31]2 years ago
3 0
I don’t get the question or maybe this not a question
Where is the question you are just telling the things not asking question
igomit [66]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The french and indian war or seven year war was the war between france and Britain that was mostly in north America but also on european continent. It started because of territory  and difficulties of trading because Britain was pushing indians out of their territory to settle their people.

:

You might be interested in
What agreement did the Sioux accept in return for peace under the fort laramie treaty of 1868?
yKpoI14uk [10]
The Sioux agreed to settle within a reservation in Black Hills of the Dakota territory in exchange for peace.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What must have been allowed by the Romans for Christianity to spread so far and wide?
8_murik_8 [283]
By the third century, Christianity was well established in and around Greece and the Middle East, as well as in Rome, Alexandria, Carthage and a few cities such as Lyons in the 'barbarian' western Europe.

Christianity had largely failed to penetrate Egypt outside Alexandria, or much of western Europe. Even Italy, outside the city of Rome, seems to have largely resisted Christianity. It seems that the Egyptian and Celtic religions had not entered a period of decline and scepticism in the way that the Greco-Roman religion had done. However, there was no impediment to Christians preaching in those areas, other than a lack of interest on the part of the population.

Christian tradition suggests that the Christians suffered constant harrassment and persecution by the Roman authorities. However, Euan Cameron (Interpreting Christian History: The Challenge of the Churches' Past) says, "Contrary to popular tradition, the first three centuries of Christianity were not times of steady or consistent persecution. Persecution was sporadic, intermittent, and mostly local." Edward Gibbon (The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) goes further and, on a number of occasions, praises the pagan Romans for their general tolerance towards Christianity. Widespread and persistent persecution of other faiths only really began with the Christian Empire.

There was a total of perhaps 12 years of official persecution of Christianity during nearly three hundred years in which Christianity existed in the pagan Empire. Otherwise, the Christians were largely allowed to worship as they pleased, and even to proselytise their faith, as long as they took care not to offend others or disturb the peace. This allowed Christianity to prosper and spread far and wide.

Hope this helps :)
5 0
3 years ago
What were two potential problems
igomit [66]

Answer:

The amount of energy it takes on peoples labor to physically carry water back to their village and worrying about evaportation in hot weather which makes water transportation party weather dependant.

Looking for a clean source of water in the first place is also a tough one.

7 0
3 years ago
Why were the Americans panicked about the Cuban missile crisis?
mart [117]
Because America had a connection with Cuba at the time
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision for Worcester v. Georgia? It required white men to leave the Indians' lands in
inysia [295]

Answer and Explanation:

The Supreme Court in Worcester v. Georgia analyzed that  the Cherokee Nation was considered a separate political entity that could not be run by the state. Georgia's license law was illegitimate, and Worcester's conviction should be overturned. Dating back of early colonial America, the Native American communities were conceived of as "separate nations,” the Court first pointed to evidence. The Court then claimed that today's "treaties and laws of the United States [also] contemplate the Indian territory  separated from that of the states, and provide that all intercourse with them shall be carried on exclusively by the government of the union."

That is why the United States can negotiate the terms of Indian lands and the use of thence. States were shortfalls of constitutional power to deal with such "nations" at all. Thus, Georgia could not pass the license law. Moreover, it also could not convict Worcester for violation of the law.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What role did the emperor play in the feudal system under the Tokugawa Shogunate?
    15·1 answer
  • Determine which secondary sources are reliable and which are unreliable. encyclopedias personal history blogs history blogs main
    7·1 answer
  • The Rights listed above were
    14·1 answer
  • 13. Which of the following are infection control techniques?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about monsoons are correct? Choose all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • Was the assistance given to the East
    11·1 answer
  • Which is the most extreme system of social inequality?
    9·2 answers
  • Clean and green sa komunidad​
    11·1 answer
  • How did mentors help Katherine Johnson?
    11·1 answer
  • Does anyone know Arabic here?<br>like who can answer questions in Arabic?​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!