Answer:
5000
Explanation:
100,000x5%= 5000
5000x4 years= 20,000x5%= 1000
5000x5=25,000x5%= 1250
1250+ 1000= 2250
R= 1750
5000-2250-1000= 1750
I might be wrong
Answer:
Rivercity Coffee Shop
Chad cannot sue Jose. The $10,000 is paid to Jose is a bribe. Since a bribe is not legal, it cannot form the basis for an enforceable contract.
Moreover, the offer by Chad is an antitrust and anti-competition consideration that is legally frowned upon. illegal contract
Explanation:
For a contract to be enforceable, it cannot be illegal. A bribe is illegal. The basis for the contract is illegal. Therefore, Chad cannot sue Jose. Since Jose decided to breach the contract, neither Chad nor Jose is entitled to any compensation. Jose cannot be held liable for non-performance.
The court did not uphold the injunction because the property on which Mcpherson wants to build the Gas station that belongs to Mcpherson has the right to build a gas station on that so Mcpherson challenged this decision any upper court.
<h3>
What is an Injunction?</h3>
An injunction is a legal order requiring a person or entity to either cease doing or else start doing some specific action or task.
Thus, in this case, Mcpherson can challenge the lower court's decision in the upper court that prevents him from making a gas station on land that belongs to him.
Learn more about Injunction here:
brainly.com/question/18635611
#SPJ1
Answer:
b. deducted from net income whether declared or not
Explanation:
The formula to compute the basic earning per share is shown below:
Basic earning per share = (Net income - preferred stock dividend) ÷ (weighted average of outstanding shares)
In the case of the non- convertible cumulative preferred stock, the dividend should be paid whether the business earns profit or loss. If the business does not earn any profit during a particular year, in that period the dividend amount is carried forward to next year.
So, the dividend arrears are to be paid to the cumulative preferred stock.
Answer:
B. The lessor does not have the right to stop delivery in transit due to the lessee's breach of the lease agreement; instead, the lessor must deliver the goods to the lessee in spite of the breach, and then sue the lessee for damages.
Explanation:
During the transit of goods, if the lessor learns of a breach of the lease agreement, he has every right to stop the delivery of the goods in transit by notifying the goods carrier or bailee. Since the carrier of the goods reports directly to the lessor, once he receives instructions from the lessor to stop delivery of goods, and he still has sufficient time, the delivery should be stopped.
Once the goods are reclaimed, the lessor can then decide to sue to recover damages. He can also, decide to cancel the contract at that point
