Answer:
B. Holly's statement is normative, but Ben's is positive.
Explanation:
Positive statements are based on objective deduction of what is, or was. It is based on facts. Ben's comment "an increase in the tax on beer will raise its price", is an example of positive statement.
Normative statements are subjective and based on individual values and judgement. In her statement Holly appears to be biased against drinking much. She says "taxes should be increased on beer because college students drink too much." Is a normative statement.
Answer:
a. Differential revenue = $18 per pound
Explanation:
Differential revenue refers to additional revenue per unit.
Current revenue per unit = $20 - $15.75 = $4.25 per unit on Product J
When it will be further processed to form Product D
Net proceeds to be realized from each unit of product D = $38
Net revenue = $38 - $24.30 = $13.7
Additional or differential revenue = $38 - $20 = $18 per unit
As for $20 selling price the revenue was recognized earlier now additional revenue = $38 - $20 = $18 per pound
Note: Revenue is the proceeds from sale and not the net profit.
Differential revenue = $18 per pound
The environmental protection agency was formed in 1970, Exchange in the immediate environment is this an example of Governmental bodies and the firm.
<h3>What was the goal of the 1970 Environmental Protection Act quizlet?</h3>
- This act's objective is to "promote productive and joyful harmony between man and his environment." In 1970, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established. The cleanup of toxic waste left behind from decades of unrestricted dumping was its primary focus.
- The Environmental Protection Agency's principal responsibility is to regulate environmental law. It was founded in 1970. They put in place programs to reduce pollution and protect the environment. Describe the federal rules and regulations in place to protect the environment from air pollution.
To learn more about Environmental Protection Agency refer,
brainly.com/question/14956213
#SPJ4
Nate finds the language of the contract to buy bedroom furniture difficult to understand due to "procedural unconscionability".
<h3>What is
procedural unconscionability?</h3>
Unconscionability that results from the contract-making process rather than from a contract's terms that are inherently unfair or unreasonable
Examples of Procedural Unconscionability is-
- influencing an underprivileged party who would not have otherwise signed the contract to do so.
- minimising important clauses in contracts for the sake of the underdog.
- If one side uses threats of violence against the other party, his family, or friends, this is known as coercion.
Therefore, Procedural unconscionability is based on elements that deprive a party of a meaningful choice, such as customer ignorance or a significant amount of unclear fine print.
To know more about elements required in contract-making, here
brainly.com/question/8116487
#SPJ4
