Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
The use of government spending and taxing the policy to influence the economy
Answer:
attributing human thoughts and feelings to inanimate objects and forces
Explanation:
Animism: In psychology, the term "animism" is described as the belief that specific objects that are being inanimate or non-living consists of thoughts, feelings, and possess the mental qualities and characteristics associated with living things. However, people are trying to associate human feelings and qualities to an inanimate thing or object.
In the question above, the correct answer is "attributing human thoughts and feelings to inanimate objects and forces".
Their were no official vice president candidates in the election of 1800
D. Regular river flooding
