Answer:
By offering different perspective.
Explanation:
Popular historical events, tend to be written from the perspective of the 'Winners'. Even if those winners were doing something unethical during the events, they can cover it by justifying their actions through some sort of divine will or missions.
The perspective from non-European histories offered a different perspective on the colonization.
In the past, colonization's were generally praised as something good. The Europeans masked it as some sort of mission to help other countries in the world improve their civilization. But, they didn't mention the dark side of it. Only after examining non-European histories the world aware of the human exploitation, resources exploitation, and the military's conflicts that's caused by the colonization.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
In 1970, in response to the welter of confusing, often ineffective environmental protection laws enacted by states and communities, President Richard Nixon created the EPA to fix national guidelines and to monitor and enforce them
<span>To rally support for American involvement in the war
</span>
For both WW that the USA was involved in, the administration of Wilson and Roosevelt most daunting task was to convince the American public, which was sharply pacified on the need to join the war.
<span></span>
Sadly, all slave families were broken up and sent to different slave owners making the depressing answer B reality ;( though I hope this helps and please give brainliest to help me reach expert ;)
Generally speaking, advanced farming techniques allowed for a surplus of food, which led to the emergence of a "artisan" class--since for the first time people were "freed" to engage in other actives besides gathering food.
