Answer:
A
Explanation:
I have researched the question in my history book and this is what i got
One of the consequences of the New Deal was that the federal government gained a lot more prominence in the lives of people. The federal government became a lot more involved in many different areas, such as the economy. I believe that this was a positive change, as it allowed the government to intervene at a time when people desperately needed relief programs and assistance.
The Civilian Conservation Corps was a work relief program that operated between 1933 and 1942 as part of the New Deal. This government program provided manual labor jobs to young men in order to help conservation efforts and the development of natural resources in rural areas. This was a positive change as it provided jobs for unemployed people, while at the same time improving the natural ecosystems of the nation. Another example of a New Deal program was the Works Progress Administration. This organization employed men to carry out public works projects, such as the construction of buildings and roads. In a similar way to the Civilian Conservation Corps, this program allowed men to be employed whole at the same time improving cities for everyone.
Answer:
<h3>C. serving in the military.
</h3>
Explanation:
- A public service is the task of proving service to a community or the citizens of a country. It includes all enterprises of public welfare and development.
- The service rendered to military is an example of public service as military/army comes under the domain of public or governmental authority.
- Therefore, serving in a military is similar to serving the public as it protects the people from internal or external challenges and unrest.
Answer:
The House of Representatives can make articles of impeachment.
Explanation:
Have a great weekend!
Answer:
The disability rights movement has also ignored issues of importance to women with disabilities and many feminists with disabilities have complained about its male domination and male orientation (Blackwell-Stratton, et al., 1988; Toews, 1985). Deegan and Brooks (1985: 1) have criticized the disability rights movement for directing most of its attention to male concerns while women's issues, such as child-bearing problems, have received little attention. They point out that, "Like many other social change movements, the disability movement has often directed its energies toward primarily male experiences." This makes many feminists with disabilities uneasy members of the disability rights movements, for example, Israel and McPherson (1983: 20), who describe how "Disabled feminists...feel uncomfortable in the disability movement because it is often male dominated and at times blatantly sexist."
Please make me Brainliest! :))
