1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grigory [225]
3 years ago
12

What does Washington think of DuBois?

History
2 answers:
aliya0001 [1]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

He disliked DuBois because they had different visions.

Explanation:

Washington believed that it was economic independence and the ability to show themselves as productive members of society that would eventually lead Black people to true equality and that they should for the time being set aside any demands for civil rights.

Du Bois maintained that education and civil rights were the only way to equality and that conceding their pursuit would simply serve to reinforce the notion of Black people as second-class citizens.

NeTakaya3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

they were besties

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Question 2
Monica [59]

In the market economy, the decisions in the farm will be guided by the prices.

<h3>What is a market economy?</h3>

It should be noted that a market economy is when the forces of demand and supply determine the market.

In this case, in the market economy, the decisions in the farm will be guided by the price. The individuals also have a vital role to play.

Learn more about market economy on:

brainly.com/question/1659498

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
The formal document, issued by the grand jury, which authorizes the government to proceed to trial against the defendant is call
Phoenix [80]
The formal document, issued by the grand jury, which authorizes the government to proceed to trial against the defendant is called the indictment. It is an accusation that  is formal and written officially for a person that has committed a serious crime. 
7 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the Aztec and Inca Empires. Explain at least three ways in which they were similar and three ways in which
dybincka [34]
Similarities:

Both empires emerged in the 14th and 15th centuries as postclassic civilizations building on the innovations of earlier political powers but expanding to greater extents

Both empires were entirely infantry, but well supplied, well-organized, and extremely aggressive and militaristic. Javelins, slings, spears and maces were used in battle.

Both empires had inherent instabilities

Both empires were fueled by corn.

Both empires have little to no seafaring, and instead stuck to the mountains and valleys in the center of the region.

Both empires conquered hundreds of cities in the region that resented their rule and taxation

Both empires were ended by Spanish invasions that capitalized on native divisions, introduced disease, and Spanish technology of guns, horses, and steel.

Both empires are misnamed-the Inka was the ruler of Tawantinsuyu, and the Aztecs adopted the name Mexica.

Both empires provided public education

Both Atahualpa and Moctezuma decided against confronting the Spanish militarily, allowing for the Spanish to take the Emperors hostage.

Attempts to restore the monarchy came after the capture and death of the emperor, but were too late.

Differences:

The Incas were bronze age, Aztecs were stone age

THe Incas assigned governors and shuffled conquered peoples around. There was a greater centralization than in Mexico

The Aztecs were a tributary empire, not a direct one.

The Aztecs had writing, while the Incas used Quipu

The Aztecs still had many rivals left unsubdued

The Inca used mostly potatoes while corn was far more dominant in Mexico.

The Inca had llamas, small but important livestock that made transport easier

The Inca had a sophisticated courier system of Chasquis along state-maintained roads

The Inca used bronze axes and halberds, with slings and maces as their main weapons alongside spears. The Aztecs used obsidian swords and glaives instead for close combat, and used javelins far more. Likewise, while Inca military relied on the unit’s experience and officer corps for their quality like the Romans, the Aztecs instead had a feudalistic division between the elite knights and commoners, with advancement by taking captives.

The Inca allowed women into their schools but not commoners. The Aztecs prohibited women but allowed for peasant men to also gain an education.

The diseases that destroyed the Incas came before the Spanish actually arrived in Peru, while the Spanish had been in Mexico for months before the plagues killed the emperor and populace.

Moctezuma’s mistake was trying to use generosity to awe the Spanish and try to coax them on his side, while Atahualpa’s was trying to awe them with his army rather than actually using it.

The Inca political crisis was a civil war between two brothers, while the Aztec’s was a three way duel between the King, the Priests, and the Aristocracy and military.
5 0
3 years ago
What do you think were the long term effects of this removal on native Americans?
o-na [289]

Indian Removal Act was passed which resulted in the forced displacement of the Native Americans to reservation lands

Explanation:

Due to the belief of Manifest destiny, Americans decided to settle in the west of the Appalachians which was the primary area of the native american tribes like Cherokee,Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee Creek and Seminole peoples. the western tribal land became valuable because it was fertile and congenial for settling. The states which saw them included in such lands pressured the federal Government to enact the Indian removal act. "trail of Tears" is the route in which the native Americans undertook their journey by foot for displacement.

During this move, many dies out of exhaustion, starvation and cold. US gained millions of square miles of territory for settling. Much of the fertile land were used for cotton production and many slaves were employed in the plantations. Thus southern economy ran basically on agriculture and slavery.

5 0
3 years ago
Why would local religions feature sacred stories about the creation of people animals and plant life
Julli [10]

Answer:

Many of the sacred stories in local religions explain the creation people, animals, and plant life. Why would religions feature such stories? They feature stories like that because to them that is how they started. They believe the Great Spirit created all things.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • "How did the Industrial Revolution impact cities and living conditions in them?
    11·1 answer
  • As early as 100 B.C., during the Han Dynasty, Chinese traders were transporting goods along the Silk Road. Under the Tang Dynast
    9·2 answers
  • The two Supreme Court cases, Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education, addressed which of these issues?
    10·2 answers
  • Both the colonies of Pennsylvania and Maryland were founded to provide
    7·2 answers
  • When tension or disputes were at a high, which famous American politician and inventor was known to crack jokes or negotiate com
    8·2 answers
  • Which describes the Mayflower Compact? A. a promise to treat the Indians fairly B. a treaty between Massachusetts and Rhode Isla
    9·2 answers
  • What is a protected class, as definded by the equal employment opportunity commission
    6·2 answers
  • On whom did dr. mengele primarily perform experiments? how did he rationalize these experiments on these people?
    11·1 answer
  • The SALT I agreement in 1972 brought about
    5·1 answer
  • Which phrase best completes the graph.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!