1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kakasveta [241]
3 years ago
13

Is being able to speak English a reasonable qualification for the job

English
2 answers:
Kryger [21]3 years ago
8 0
English is necessary to perform the job effectively for communications with customers, coworkers, or supervisors who only speak English in emergencies or other situations in which workers must speak a common language to promote safety.
Serhud [2]3 years ago
5 0

Yes, for some jobs this would be a reasonable qualification. If the job involves reading documents in English or having a front facing position with people who only speak English then this would be reasonable. For example, if you lived in Tokyo but you were working at a hotel that had mostly English speaking guests, it would make sense to have someone who could converse with them in English.

You might be interested in
26. I could see Ramesh ............ the entrance examination.​
Assoli18 [71]

Answer:

in

Explanation:

please please mark me v

brilliant

4 0
2 years ago
How are the ideas presented in the text "The Ramayana" ​
krok68 [10]

Answer: Good deeds are the means to reach a higher plane and likewise bad deeds lead to destruction and doom

Explanation: It is like Karma. Good deeds are the means to reach a higher plane and likewise bad deeds lead to destruction and doom

8 0
1 year ago
The following sentence may have a error, choose the best revision. If no required revision, choose "no improvements or correctio
Alekssandra [29.7K]
C.
This is because the question says "than" followed by a name (noun). You can say more friendly but it is not commonly used in the US.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think Elizabethan audiences would enjoy a play that included supernatural characters?
vodomira [7]

The era from the Queen Elizabeth I is the period in the Tudor era of the history of England during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I from 1558 to 1603. Historians often portray it as the golden age in English history. The symbol of Britannia, a female personification of Great Britain, was first used in 1572, and subsequently, to mark the Elizabethan age as a renaissance that inspired national pride through classical ideals, international expansion, and naval triumph over Spain.

This "golden age" signified the pinnacle of the English Renaissance and saw the flowering of poetry, music and literature. The era is most famous for theatre, as William Shakespeare and many others composed plays that broke free of England's past style of theatre. It was an age of exploration and expansion abroad, while back at home, the Protestant Reformation became more acceptable to the people, most certainly after the Spanish Armada was repelled. It was also the end of the period when England was a separate realm before its royal union with Scotland.

The Elizabethan age also contrasts sharply with the previous and following sovereignties. It was a brief period of inner peace between the English Reformation and the religious battles between Protestants and Catholics and the political battles between parliament and the monarchy that consumed the remainder of the seventeenth century.

The relative peace of mind that Elizabeth gave the British allowed them to start to believe more freely, without the fear of the church condemning their soul they could express, enjoy and exercise their faith more freely.

Due to the all the previous information presented,  we can conclude that Elizabethan audiences would enjoy a play that included supernatural characters because in that moment:

A. Many people believed in the power of the prophecy.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do the passages differ in their ideas about fish farming?
Sveta_85 [38]

The correct answer is C. The author of passage 1 believes fish farming is beneficial to the environment,  while the author of Passage 2 believes fish farming is not the solution to  overfishing

Explanation:

The two passages provide a different about fish farming, which is the practice that involves raising fish rather than capturing them in their natural habitat. In the case of the passage 1, the author proposes fish farming is beneficial because this stops the problem of overfishing, this can be seen in "Fish farming helps humans continue to consume fish while protecting valuable marine resources" that shows fish farming is the way to protect the environment and the populations of fish while benefitting humans.

On the opposite, the author of passage 2 exposes the negative effects of fish farming and in this way shows this is not a solution. This can be seen in "one of the major problems with fish farming is water supply contamination" or in "it also causes destructions to habits" that supports the idea fishing farming does not solve the problems caused by overfishing.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many people is there in the world
    6·2 answers
  • What is a other way to write this form 4.293
    9·1 answer
  • Some ways in which you show your willingness to learn new things
    13·1 answer
  • How was scott kellys body changed​
    9·1 answer
  • In a few (two or three) paragraphs, respond to President Regan's persuasive skill as shown in the “Space Shuttle "Challenger' Tr
    9·2 answers
  • The excessive pride that Oedipus has is also called _____.
    6·1 answer
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP!!! PLEASE HELP ME :)
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these sentences is a run-on sentence?
    15·1 answer
  • Please can someone help my assignment in english.​
    9·1 answer
  • Unscramble eslureir ​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!