Answer:
Censors infringe(violate) the right of freedom when they hinder(restrict) spoken words, printed matter, symbolic messages, freedom of association, and lots more.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is that strong circumstantial evidence justifies a warrent.
The US Constitution is adaptable because the Founding Fathers deliberately made it relatively vague--meaning that they didn't get too specific because they knew it would have to endure in the future, when minds and society would be greatly different. It's also adaptable because it allows for amendments, which keep the document relevant with modern times.
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be RACIAL DISPARITIES. <span>Widespread adoption of intermediate sanctions may further exacerbate racial disparities in prison populations. Intermediate sanctions is defined as </span><span>new punishment options developed to fill the gap between traditional probation and traditional jail or prison sentences </span>Hope this answers your question. Thanks for posting it.
