Answer:
a form of scrambled merchandising, consisting of large stores offering everything in a single one-stop outlet.
Explanation:
hypermarket can be regarded as
retail store which consists of
department store as well as a grocery supermarket. It is usually large establishment, and gives wide variety of products like groceries, appliances and clothing. Hypermarkets is a best place where shoppers get one-stop shopping experience. It should be noted A hypermarket is a form of scrambled merchandising, consisting of large stores offering everything in a single one-stop outlet.
Answer:
Strategic plan.
Explanation:
A strategic plan is a document that establishes the direction of an organization. It can be a single page or fill up a binder, depending on the size and complexity of the business and work. Most managers can benefit from having a strategic plan.
Answer:
free rider
Explanation:
In economics, a free rider is someone that benefits from using some service or good but is not doing anything to pay for his/her consumption of the service or good, i.e. they are using something for free and they do not wish to change that situation.
Free riders are much more common than what many believe, for example, people living in the suburbs that go into a city and use their public services, e.g. transportation, roads, police officers, parks, etc.
Answer:
B) Businesses can actually do very little in terms of social responsibility.
Explanation:
Milton Friedman is most famous for the defense of the Chicago School economics which is a neoclassical approach to macroeconomics. He favored free trade, smaller government and a slow but constant growth of the money supply. I personally disagree with neoclassical economists because they have the tendency to mess things up and time proves they are always wrong (that is a biased but positive statement). He was the father of monetarism, but if you look at his last two disciples, George Bush and George W. Bush, the outcome was not positive ⇒ 3 deep recessions in 3 presidential terms.
As a neoclassical economist, Friedman believed and argued in favor of the trickle down in economics. That means that if you allow the rich to get overwhelmingly rich, their riches will spill over to the rest of society. Not because they are good people that like to share their wealth, but because they need workers and employees to keep consuming goods and services in order to get the economy moving. Eventually the spilled over wealth should return to the top. So it is no wonder why he opposed corporate social responsibility, since wasting time and money in the community, employees or the environment was simply a waste of resources that could be used to increase stockholders' wealth.
I understand how theoretically this might work, but it takes the human factor out of the equation and expectations are extremely important in economics, that is why they always fail.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
on page layout tab on page setup,choose margins
