Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Which poem? are you in the plato program??
Answer:
where is the poem/story
if there is no context how can i answer
Explanation:
LOL
The correct answer is argumentation, or argumentative writing.
It is a type of writing where the author is giving his or her arguments as to why they believe their position is the correct one. He or she is explaining why their ideas should be respected, even though they are controversial and unlike those of other people.
