Please answer this: 27+4×(8−4)

Please help me! I will give brainliest and 50 points if all correct!

miss Akunina [59]

Answer:

10. ○ $\displaystyle 4,85; 4\frac{17}{20}$

9. ○680%

8. ○40%

7. ○ $\displaystyle 60$

6. ○0,4, 40,5%, 11⁄25, 4⁄9

5. ○ $\displaystyle 0,928$

4. ○1%

3. ○76%

2. $\displaystyle See\:above\:grid$

1. $\displaystyle See\:above\:grid$

Step-by-step explanation:

10. To convert from a percentage to a decimal, move the decimal mark twice to the left; each 20 is worth 5, and since 5 by 17 is 85, you have your fractional part of 17⁄20, then attach the whole number of 4.

9. To convert from a mixed number\improper fraction to a percentage, first evaluate the fractional part for a decimal answer, then move the decimal mark twice to the right.

8. To convert from a fraction to a percentage, evaluate the fraction for a decimal answer, then move the decimal mark twice to the right.

7. $\displaystyle \frac{132}{220} = \frac{3}{5} =$ 60%

Greatest Common Divisor [GCD]: 44

6. $\displaystyle \frac{11}{25} =$ 44%

_

$\displaystyle \frac{4}{9} =$ 44,4%

$\displaystyle 0,4 =$ 40%

Now that these are all percentages, it is alot easier to order them from least to greatest.

5. To convert from a percentage to a decimal, move the decimal mark twice to the left.

4. To convert from a decimal to a percentage, move the decimal mark twice to the right.

3. Each 25 is worth 4, and since 4 by 19 is 76, you get 76%.

2. Each 25 is worth 4, and since 4 by 6 is 24, you get 24%, and this graph.

1. Each 36 is worth 2 7⁄9, and since 12 by 2 7⁄9 is 33⅓, you get 33⅓%, so you would choose this answer.

I am joyous to assist you anytime.

8 0

2 years ago

Find the missing term in the geometric sequence. 1, 17, 289,

Greeley [361]

4,913 is the correct answer.
Please vote my answer brainliest! Thanks.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

10k to the third power + 8k to the second power + 10 divided by (k+1)

torisob [31]

10k^4+10k^3+8k^2+8k+10/k+1 not sure if this is what you are looking for or not hope it helps

6 0

3 years ago

Jasmine is making cookies for everyone in her class and she wants to make sure everyone gets at least one cookie. The recipe cal

andreev551 [17]

Answer:

1.5 or 3/2 teaspoons

Step-by-step explanation:

If her class has 36 students, and there are 12 cookies in every batch, then she needs 3 batches to give everyone in her class 1 cookie each. It takes 1/2 teaspoon for every recipe, so she needs 3 of those. 3 × 1/2 = 1.5 (or 3/2)

7 0

2 years ago

Helppppppppppp:)))))))))

Whitepunk [10]

Hi there!

We are given the set of ordered pairs below:

$\large \boxed{(3, - 1),(2, - 2),(0,2),(2,1)}$

1. What is the domain?

Domain is a set of all x-values in one set of ordered pairs. So what are the x-values that I am talking about? In ordered pairs, we define x and y which both have relation to each others which we can write as (x,y). That's right, the domain is set of all x-values from ordered pairs.

Therefore, we gather only x-values from (x,y). Hence, the domain is {3,2,0,2}. Whoops! Something is not right. As we learn in Set Theory that we don't write the same or repetitive in a set. Hence, the actual domain is {0,2,3}

2. What is the range?

Because domain is set of all x-values. Then what do you think the range is? That's right! The range is set of all y-values. If you got this right before looking up the underlined words then a handclap for you! So how do we find range? Simple, we just do like finding the domain in the Q1, except we gather the y-values in (x,y) instead and make sure that we don't write same number!

Therefore, gather y-values from the ordered pairs. Hence, the range is {-2,-1,1,2}

3. Is the relation a function?

All functions are relations but not all relations are functions. Function is a set of ordered pairs where domain is not repetitive or in a set, there cannot be more than one same value. Consider the following relation: (1,1),(1,2) - Oh, looks like in a set of ordered pairs, there are two same domains which make it only a relation, and not a function. On the other hand, (1,1),(2,2) - Looking good! No same or repetitive domain, making it indeed a function.

Consider the domain from Q1 and see if there are two same values of x in a set. Looks like the relation is not a function since there are same x-values which are 2 in a set, making it only a relation. Hence, the relation is not a function.

These are all 3 answers along with an explanation. Let me know if you have any doubts regarding Relations and Functions.

From the Q1's answer, there are two bold texts, please choose the second bold text to answer (the one with underline) and not the first one (the one with same 2's).

Good luck on your assignment, have a nice day!

4 0

2 years ago