<span>The Jungle and the Progressive Era. The publication of Upton Sinclair's 1906 novel The Jungle produced an immediate and powerful effect on Americans and on federal policy, but Sinclair had hoped to achieve a very different result.</span>
Answer:
You'd like tea <u>don't</u><u> </u><u>you</u>?
Sabbhya'd already finished her homework, <u>didn't</u><u> </u><u>she</u>?
The result of the young seaman's disrespectful attitude was that <em>A. </em><em>God punished the seaman </em><em>for his cruelty by inflicting him </em><em>with a sickness </em><em>so serious that </em><em>he did not recover.</em>
William Bradford was one of the travelers on the Mayflower that was sailing to the future Plymouth colony. In his journals, he wrote of a young man who sailed with them.
The young man was quite problematic because:
- he disrespected the sick
- he cursed the sick and told them that he would help throw them overboard and take their property and,
- he was quite vulgar
He was however struck with a sickness that according to William Bradford, came from God. The young man never made it to the colony and was instead thrown overboard.
In conclusion, because of the young man's disrespect, God punished him with an illness that killed him.
<em>More on the journey can be found at brainly.com/question/19737965.</em>
The poem Cherry Tree is about the ecstasy of the poet over a plant which he has seeded eight years ago.It was a seed of cherry tree which took eight years to grow. In the poem, Ruskin Bond expresses his wonder at the nature works hard to survive in difficult conditions against all odds.Eight years ago, the poet planted a cherry seed because he wanted to have a plant of his own. The young poet used to water it daily but he was unaware of the fact that cherry plant needs extra special care to grow into a healthy tree. Inspite of getting any special attention, by the end of May, the poet saw the small cherry sapling coming out of the ground. It was a very small plant, young and fragile, vulnerable to all kinds of external dangers.
Answer:
B). "He found that children and adults who have read stories their whole lives were more likely to correctly identify the feelings and thoughts of others than those who do not read regularly."
C). "Trying to understand these characters exercises the same mental muscle that helps us understand people in the real world."
Explanation:
The above two evidence factually support and substantiate the claim that 'people who read stories are better at communicating and understanding the feelings of others.'
The first evidence i.e. option B states that <u>the research revealed 'the children or adults who have been reading stories constantly their whole lives are able to recognize the thoughts or feelings of others more accurately' while the second evidence i.e. option C asserts logically that 'in attempt to understand the characters of stories, the same mental muscle is required for understanding people in real life.'</u>
Thus, these two pieces of evidence not only support but substantiates how reading comprehends our understanding of thoughts, opinions, or feelings of others. Hence, <u>options B and C</u> are the correct answers.
