All categories

3 years ago

When deciding whether a piece of writing should be written formally the author should primarily consider the___of the writing

English

1 answer:

denpristay [2]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The purpose

Explanation:

The purpose of an essay or article predicts how it is written. Hope this helps ;)

You might be interested in

Why do people have strong convictions?

posledela

Answer:

Below:

Explanation:

It engenders a feeling of security. It helps everyone concentrate on doing their best work because they see that everything is under control. In contrast, uncertainty – the opposite of conviction –is perceived by the brain as a threat.

Hope it helps...

It's Muska.... (◠‿◠✿)

6 0

2 years ago

I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLEST IF YOU ANSWER CORRECTLY

iren2701 [21]

Answer: B.

Explanation: The rest either introduce what the body paragraph will be supporting, or conclude on what the body paragraphs have already supported.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are the authors’ main points in the article? Check all that apply.

yaroslaw [1]

Answer:

Step 1: Determine which options are correct

What are the authors’ main points in the article? Check all that apply.

- Option A: Social media was key in spreading news of the Arab Spring to the outside world.

- Option B: Social media networks played a crucial role in the Arab uprisings.

- Option E: The speed of news media threatens traditional Arab American news outlets.

Option A is correct because the article truly talks about the spreading news throughout the Arab Spring to the outside world. Also, the social media played an important role to be fuel the Arab uprisings. Finally, the last correct option is E because the fast reliable social media was much more quicker and better than the old and outdated news outlets.

Look at attachment

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

6. Zaroff also says, "Instinct is no match for reason." Again, explain his

Stells [14]

Let's begin by directly answering the question. Please, keep in mind this question is asking for a personal opinion. You can use this answer as a template in case you disagree with the opinion expressed:

Yes, I believe Zaroff is right when he says, "Instinct is no match for reason." It was our ability to reason that led us to humans to survive and thrive in extreme environments all over the world. It was reason that allowed us to learn from the past and to develop intellectually. That does not mean reason cannot be used for the bad. We do, in fact, use it to destroy, be it with pesticides or with an atomic bomb, for instance. But still, the amazing scientific and technological advances we see in the modern world - take vaccines, smartphones, or 3D printers as an example - are proof of how reason helped us prevail, evolve, and survive.

The character mentioned in the question is general Zaroff, from the short story "The Most Dangerous Game" by American author Richard Connell (1893-1949). Zaroff is a Russian general who lives secluded in an island. His hobby is hunting, and he has grown quite proficient in it. So much so that he no longer sees animals as enough of a challenge. Zaroff now hunts men, who, because of their ability to reason, are more difficult preys. As a matter of fact, the main conflict in the story begins when Zaroff decides to hunt the main character, Rainsford.

In conclusion, the general values humans' ability to reason, but uses it as an excuse to make them his prey. Although his argument that reason is better than instinct is not necessarily wrong, his actions are immoral and indefensible.

Learn more about Zaroff here:

brainly.com/question/6714590?referrer=searchResults

5 0

2 years ago

Where are they taking Hester

Marat540 [252]

Answer:

Area 51 boy

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago