By contrast, populist authoritarian regimes "are mobilizational regimes in which a strong, charismatic, manipulative leader rules through a coalition involving key lower-class groups". Examples include Argentina under Perón, Egypt under Nasser and Venezuela under Chávez and Maduro
Answer:
C
Explanation:
monopolies are more harmful than beneficial because they stop the ability for competition. Competition gives the consumer more choice to choose what to buy but a monopoly makes only one product available.
I’m not sure which reformers you’re referring. However, most reformers during the stated time period gained support through the press or by word of mouth. Ambient bars and beer halls were a good place for politics to be discussed during the time period. They could have printed their information, or done speeches and events in the public square. (Public square referring to bars, halls, gatherings, or even public protests) at the time boss napping was actually a form of protest in France and other European countries on a smaller scale.
Answer:
to believe that they were merely assisting.
Explanation:
