Answer:
Juliet is not allowed to associate with Romeo because he is a Montague. If he had any other name it would be fine. She’s complaining that his name is meaningless. If the rose had any other name it would still be the same. So with Romeo; he would still be the same beautiful young man even if he had a different name. “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet” Juliet knows that the blood feud prevents her from loving a Montague. She ponders it. It’s only your name that’s the enemy. You are what you are, even though you may be a Montague. What’s ‘Montague’? It isn’t hand or foot or arm or face or any other part belonging to a man. Oh I wish you had a different name. What is so special about a name? A rose, even if it were called something else, would smell just as sweet. So Romeo would still have all the perfection that he has, even if he were not called Romeo. Romeo, take off your name and in exchange for that whole name, which is not really a part of what you are, you can have all of me.
Answer:
answer choices?
Explanation:
what are the answer choices?
<span>infinitive: "To travel"
To travel is the infinitive form of this verb, which could be conjugated into any other type of verb form, but this is it at its purest. It sets up the sentence without tying it to a subject, and then towards the end relates it back to the type of people the phrase could apply to.</span>
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>The character of the father (king) in “The Princess and the Tin Box,” is a supporting role. Not much is mentioned about him but through the story an outline can be drawn. </em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
James Thurber’s short story “The Princess and the Tin Box,” is written in the form a modern fable. The main character is the Princess who has just turned eighteen years old and spoilt with riches since childhood. The King or the father of the Princess has a minimal role to play. But from the story we can understand that the princess was very dear to him since she was a baby. He provided her with the best of things that included only gold, precious stones etc. All things below this standard was not even kept in the palace grounds. So he basically, kept his daughter lavishly and dependant on others with all the amenities.
B. Royalty living in the "Old World"
Why?
Because Irish Immigrants, Native Americans, and African Americans were all mentioned as dreamers in "Let America be America Again" but Royalty living in the "Old World" was not mentioned to be a dreamer in the poem. Therefore, the answer is B. Royalty living in the "Old World".
