Answer: Parramore used made the essay more convincing because it made the reader feel as if it was something they already knew was bad.
Explanation:
Throughout the essay the words and language that Parramore used made the essay more convincing because it made the reader feel as if it was something they already knew was bad. For example she says in page 32-33 “Surveillance has a way of dehumanizing workers.” which is very convincing when the reader reads
Bending my thumbs
you cant bend thumbs
because you will just hurt yourself
Answer:
<em>Personally, yes, I believe it is laudable to value both persistence and hard work. I say I value persistence because, for example, say you and a few friends are playing a game of football, and later went to a actual football game they really had to play in. Maybe one of the boys that had earlier been playing around had been very competitive, but, possibly because it was not a real game, it did not really matter. But lets say now that he´s in the game, and the other team scored one point, he huffs and puffs, and gets upset, saying he´s not playing the rest of the game, just because he had not gotten the first point. The other team members, on the other hand, were still determined, persisting through the game. </em>
<em>I think it is laudable to value hard work, because life is never going to be peaches and plums. Maybe you are a teen, and you have to help your uncle and auntie with moving in to a new house. The boxes and packed up belongings are not going to be brand new, dust free, no bugs attached boxes. To some people, touching something dusty with a new white shirt on, is hard work. Personally, having to get anywhere near bugs at all, whether it is a moth, a rolly polly- it does not matter to me whether it is a harmless bug or not. A hornet, or a Wasp- any insect, I absolutely despise. I do not consider it hard work, but, getting near any bugs- is hard to do, majority of times.</em>
Explanation:Hope this helps.
Answer:
Explanation:
Because it adds credibility to your argument not only is this why but because it could be form someone who is smarter than you allowing the other side to agree as well knowing these words to be true. This is also a way to distract any reader from counterclaims forcing them to draw their attention to another part of the writing.
I dont think so. If ur citing from a book, newspaper.... everything should be written the same as what the book says. Hope it helps :)
