Answer:
The right answer is: b) Feelings of partisan politics had practically disappeared.
Explanation:
The presidency of James Monroe is remembered as the "Era of Good Feelings" and it can be associated to two things. Following the War of of 1812, there was a sense of national purpose and a wish for unity among Americans. Besides, Monroe appointed officials to lower posts regardless of partisan colors; this led to a reduction in political tensions and a growth of sympathy for him. The existing political parties even reduced their activities.
Explanation:
In 1651, Thomas Hobbes famously wrote that life in the state of nature – that is, our natural condition outside the authority of a political state – is ‘solitary, poore, nasty brutish, and short.’ Just over a century later, Jean-Jacques Rousseau countered that human nature is essentially good, and that we could have lived peaceful and happy lives well before the development of anything like the modern state. At first glance, then, Hobbes and Rousseau represent opposing poles in answer to one of the age-old questions of human nature: are we naturally good or evil? In fact, their actual positions are both more complicated and interesting than this stark dichotomy suggests. But why, if at all, should we even think about human nature in these terms, and what can returning to this philosophical debate tell us about how to evaluate the political world we inhabit today?
The question of whether humans are inherently good or evil might seem like a throwback to theological controversies about Original Sin, perhaps one that serious philosophers should leave aside. After all, humans are complex creatures capable of both good and evil. To come down unequivocally on one side of this debate might seem rather naïve, the mark of someone who has failed to grasp the messy reality of the human condition. Maybe so. But what Hobbes and Rousseau saw very clearly is that our judgements about the societies in which we live are greatly shaped by underlying visions of human nature and the political possibilities that these visions entail.
B. The senators! I don't have much more info to add, but I hope this helps!
Answer:
could you post a pic of the drop down menus?
Children get their public opinion from their parents. The parents may be sitting at the dinner table talking about some form of their public opinion. The children are also at the table listening to the parents conversation. By listening to the conversation the children receive a basis from the parents to create their own public opinion.<span />
