1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iVinArrow [24]
2 years ago
8

What would be your review of story Julius Caesar.

English
2 answers:
liraira [26]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

do ko nga Rin Alam e heart nyo nla ok✌️

erica [24]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The Tragedie of Julius Caesar dates from around 1599, and was first published by Heminge and Condell as the sixth play in the Tragedies section of their First Folio of 1623. The Folio text is thus the only authoritative text of the play and has been the basis of all later editions. Julius Caesar is also a particularly clean text with few obvious errors and comparatively few points where conjectural readings are called for. There is ample evidence of thematic ambiguity in the play, an ambiguity which the play’s editorial and theatrical history has sought to smooth over.As with Shakespeare’s “Cymbeline,” the titular character isn’t the play’s main character – but is the most “bankable” name. The lead is Brutus, the one member of the cabal of executioners that kill Julius Caesar who does so because he truly believes that Caesar has too much power and that the Roman leader’s ambition will result in yet more power flowing to him at the expense of Romans.

In the first half of the play, the conspirators are assembled and the conspiracy planned — with Cassius leading the charge. Unlike Brutus, Cassius mostly wants Caesar dead because of jealousy over the dictator’s power and popularity. However, even in the opening acts much of the story revolves around Brutus, because Cassius knows Brutus must be on-board because he’s both popular and respected. Brutus’s participation both lends moral authority to the act and will help get others to take part. Early in the play, Caesar returns to Rome and is warned by a soothsayer to “Beware the ides of March” (March 15th.) Near the play’s mid-point, the ides arrive, and the soothsayer is proven correct. The play’s second half involves a battle between pro-Caesar forces and the forces of the conspirators. Caesar’s right-hand man, Marcus Antony, and Caesar’s heir, Octavius, purse the conspirators [notably Brutus and Cassius and their men] who’d been forced to leave the city by an angry citizenry after Mark Antony gave a clever speech at Caesar’s funeral. In tragic style, the ensuing battle doesn’t work out well for Brutus, Cassius, or those who are with them.

In broad strokes, Shakespeare follows the flow of events of recorded history. However, in the details he takes dramatic / poetic license. For one thing, he adds a supernatural element with Brutus seeing the ghost of Julius Caesar toward the play’s end. [I suppose this could also be interpreted as stress-induced mental illness / hallucination on the part of Brutus as he not only realizes things are going poorly for him and his family (he was resigned to his own demise when he signed on,) but, moreover, he may recognize that things might get worse for Rome under Caesar’s successors, rather than better. In the debate about whether to eliminate Antony (and about allowing Antony to speak at the funeral,) Brutus comes down firmly on a side favoring Antony. That said, Brutus is presented as a rock – a stoic to the core.] It should be pointed out that the other apparent supernatural element of the story, the soothsayer’s warning, is recorded in some accounts and wasn’t made up by Shakespeare (which is not so say it wasn’t made up by someone.) However, the bard did make up Caesar’s final words, “Et tu, Brute?” [“You, too, Brutus?”]

Lest one think this is irrelevant Elizabethan Era tragedy with little to say about the world today, the crowd dynamics portrayed in the play’s middle act may feel sadly familiar. All it takes for the crowd to go from “Brutus is honorable, forget Caesar” to “Let’s go burn down Brutus’s house!” is a change of speaker from Brutus to Antony. And Antony is only gently riling them up. Mostly, he’s exploiting the fact that the crowd has intensity and passion, but no intelligence. So, they are ready to go out killing and burning without much spurring them on, but they need a leader to point them in a direction (and they don’t seem to care much what the target is.) This mindless, madness of crowds can be seen when Cinna the Poet is captured by the crowd, and they beat him. Even when it’s recognized that it isn’t the same Cinna that participated in the conspiracy, the crowd continues attacking him on the basis that he’s named Cinna.

Where Titus Andronicus aims for the gut and Romeo & Juliet aims for the heart, “Julius Caesar” is more cerebral – a thinking man’s play. What is the virtuous course of action? That’s the question that plays out from beginning to end as events change. This is one of those works everyone should read.

Explanation:

\huge\red{T}\pink{H}\orange{A}{N}\blue{K}\gray{S}.........

You might be interested in
How does Wheatley's use of imagery contribute to her purpose in the poem?
dezoksy [38]

Answer: D) It provides a hopeful image that suggests that Kahlo was not restrained by her condition.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Gulliver travels is most appropriately viewed as
Leno4ka [110]
A satire on the social beliefs and the economic conditions of Europe at the time
7 0
3 years ago
Hey every one :)
marshall27 [118]
Lachrymose means very sad and tearful.

Sentence: She was lachrymose after she heard that her parents died for her sake. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At the end of the play, the prince says, “Some shall be pardoned and some shall be punished” for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.
malfutka [58]
One of the people i think is responsible for the Deaths of Romeo and Juliet is Friar Lawrence. I think he is responsible for their deaths is because when Juliet came to him for a plan he though up a half full plan that wasn't fool proof. Another Reason I think he is responsible is that if his messenger got there in time Romeo would have known about the plan. But instead his messenger got caught up in a plague and disease. So he couldn't make it in time to tell Romeo of the plan. My last reason why I think Friar Lawrence is responsible because if he was there at the tomb in time he could have stopped Romeo from killing himself. And he shouldn't have left the tomb so Juliet could have the chance to kill herself.
8 0
1 year ago
How does Higgins respond when Liza tries to stand up to him?
tia_tia [17]

Answer:

He withdraws his answer.

Explanation:

She stood up to him so he revoked his offer and had her taken away.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If a student fails to recognize how to properly quote the words of an author that student may be found guilty of what
    9·1 answer
  • Not sure with answers
    12·1 answer
  • if i could eat anything rn what would it be ? (options are mcdonalds, chick-fil-a, burger king, pizza hut, kfc, taco bell, jack
    14·2 answers
  • Which word is a synonym for the word generous?
    5·2 answers
  • 6. Why is it important for you to participate in your community? Why is it important for you to vote or otherwise be part of the
    13·1 answer
  • If you have read hamlet. Help me plz.
    9·1 answer
  • I need help! Thanks in advance<br>​
    9·1 answer
  • Dose anyone know the answer
    11·1 answer
  • Which excerpt best justifies this conclusion?
    12·1 answer
  • This is part of Slaughterhouse Five
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!