Your answer is A. So that you know what they care about and can use rhetorical strategies that will be effective.
Answer:
The central idea in “Abuelito Who” by Sandra Cisneros is, love can fall away as people get older.
Explanation:
‘Abuelito Who’ is a very beautiful and nostalgic poem written by Sandra Cisneros. Abuelito here is a grandfather who is in a state of poor health. The central idea of the poem is based on Abuelito only, it depicts that as a person ages, love changes over time, it doesn’t remain the same.
The narrator of this poem had a very good relationship with Abuelito, the narrator illustrates the bond he used to share with him and how Abuelito uses to laugh a lot. The speaker have described his grandfather’s laugh like the letter ‘K.’
<em>A.1-</em><em> "Opt-a"</em>
It is a Primary source.
<em>A.2- </em><em>"Opt-c"</em>
She marched along with other neighbors with Bells and Flags.
<em>A.3-</em><em> "Opt-a"</em>
Dawson's brothers and father died because of the riots. It was really necessary for her that, she must keep moving in order to avoid any harm.
<em> A.4-</em><em> "Opt-d"</em>
A textbook is classified under Secondary sources.
<em>A.5-</em><em> "Opt-a"</em>
The whole paragraph indicates the personal trauma of the author. The iteration of the word "I", several times, is hyperbolic and shows turmoil in the writer's mind. This suggests that she is devastated mentally and has become as bitter as the war.
Answer:
umm water,ground,light,fire,dark
Hello. You did not submit the texts to which the question refers. The texts are:
#1 The Case for Mars By: Alexander Fisher
#2 Mars—A Waste of Time and Money By: Juniper Springs
Answer and Explanation:
1. The authors had opposing views. While Fisher considers exploration and Mars to be a positive thing that will benefit humanity, Springs believes that exploration is a waste of money and that it is very dangerous for humans.
2. The authors use the same point of comparison, since both discuss in their arguments, the atmosphere of Mars, the technology used, the limitation of robots and the possibility of using Mars to escape from the problems of the earth.
3. The authors present support their points of view in different ways, as one shows positive evidence about the exploration of Mars, while the other shows negative evidence. An example of this can be seen when Fisher says that exploration of Mars could promote wonderful technological elements for humanity, while Springs says that exploration will be a waste of money and that this money should be used to solve problems that the earth presents.
4. Both focus more on logical appeals, although they present some moments of emotional appeals, especially Springs' text, which tries to stimulate a certain dread of Mars exploration.
