Answer:
Reasons for irrational behaviour : Political brand name establishment in favour of candidate, enhancing brand loyalty towards.
More knowledgable public : Would value candidate working on real development, rather than mere brand name.
Explanation:
Political elections are determined by the public's impressions of the candidates rather than the candidates' views on the issues.
Reason(s) of such irrational voting behaviour could be : The candidate having established a personal brand image of himself/ herself, specially in a particular community group. This makes the people of the community being 'brand loyal' towards their candidate, irrespective of his or her ideologies. It is also possible to make that political personality (candidate) an important part of 'national image' or 'community leader image', which reinforce support for the candidate, irrespective of person perception and attitudes.
If public were more knowledgeable about factors that affect person perception and attitudes : The political support would not be based on lineaged political brand names. It would rather be earned on the basis of candidate's performance for socio - economic, political upliftment. This would give power in the hands of deserving politicians & create a message that 'real work' & not just 'name' is needed to gain political success
Answer:
one must be prepared to sacrifice their own children to preserve France
Explanation:
hope it helps sorry if not
Answer:
Modern people are generally more educated. They have more resources to expend on formal and informal education and more access to sources of information and more free time in which to absorb these sources. They better understand the consequences of their actions. They are generally better fed and less desperate.
The answer is <span>microeconomics
</span><span>microeconomics refers to the branch of economics that focused on observing the interactions between individuals and firms when they're competing to obtain and utilizing resources.
Natural disasters would increase the rarity of the resources and will tend to increase the price of goods and services in that area.</span>
Answer:
A. Give the subject comprehensive information about the new drug, including its side effects. Discuss the pros and cons of both the investigational drug and the commercially available drug and then allow the subject to decide whether to withdraw from the research to take the new drug.
Explanation:
In the medical sector, the right of an individual is highly sort after before an decision is taken regarding to the patient's health. For example, a patient decision would be required before an operation is carried out on him irrespective of the critical state of the medical issue.
In the case of the 46-year-old man, it is the right of the man to take the decision whether to withdraw from the research drugs and embark on the commercially available treatment drug.
What the doctor (investigator ) can only be able to do is to offer all informations regarding to the new treatment drugs that would allow the patient make informed decision.
