The main purpose of both documents is to assert the rights and freedoms of the people to form their own governments -- governments which will protect their rights as citizens.
Historical context:
The Declaration of Independence (1776) asserted the American colonies' decision to break away from British government. It included the same Enlightenment ideals of natural rights and liberties that would characterize the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen produced later (1789) in France.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen is a fundamental document of the French Revolution, which was written by Abbé Sieyès and the Marquis de Lafayette. Abbé Sieyès was a prominent clergyman in France who supported the rights of the common people. The Marquis de Lafayette was a member of the nobility who had fought in America's war for independence against Britain. Their document was written in consultation with Thomas Jefferson of the United States, who had drafted the Declaration of Independence.
<span>Woman were not equal, the constitution failed to give them the right to vote, or have equal representation. However as a living document gave an ability to change such injustices. Without a voice women were unable to effect change in the public domain.</span>
Answer:
The Abbasids overthrew the Umayyad dynasty in 750 CE, supporting the mawali, or non-Arab Muslims, by moving the capital to Baghdad in 762 CE. The Persian bureaucracy slowly replaced the old Arab aristocracy as the Abbasids established the new positions of vizier and emir to delegate their central authority.
Explanation:
SHORT TERM EFFECTS
* The Eighteenth Amendment.
* Was illegal to manufacture, sell, or transport liquors.
* Women's Christian Temperance Union.
* National Prohibition Party.
* Bargain Days.
* Prohibition was dangerous to society.
* Tainted industrial alcohol.
* Would make you'r own alcohal.
* High emorals.
* Was know lower life social field.
Vote brainliest answer
Answer:
A. limit free speech.
Explanation:
The first amendment of United States constitution protect the citizens' ability for "Free speech". This law was intended to give the citizens with the power to protest the government. But many people interpret it as the ability to say whatever they want to other people without consequences.
The "clear and present danger' test was devised by the Supreme Court. The consist of standards that law enforcement can follow to differentiate "Free speech" and assault.
As a general rule, If the speech that given by a person either threatening the welfare of individuals, disrupt public order, or agitating other individuals to be a target for attack, that speech would no longer be protected by the 1st amendment.
