The debate over slavery divided the United States into two sides. The north emerged as the center of antislavery activity during the abolitionist movement. The abolitionists objected to slavery for moral reasons. They believed that it was an unjust practice that stripped humans of their dignity.

Explanation:

Slavery was practiced in British America from the beginning of the colonial era, and was firmly established when the Declaration of Independence of the United States was signed. After this, there was a gradual expansion of abolitionism in the North, that stated that slavery was contrary to human dignity, while the rapid expansion of the cotton industry since the 1800s caused the South to cling tightly to slavery, and try to expand it into the new western territories of the country. Thus, slavery polarized the nation into slave states and free states through the Mason-Dixon line, which separated Maryland (slave) and Pennsylvania (free).

5 0

3 years ago

Write two arguments in the debate over missouri statehood: one from the perspective of a

ivann1987 [24]

A debate from the perspective of a Northerner over Missouri Statehood would be one talking about the importance of limiting slavery.

A argument from a Southerner would be one arguing that Northerners should allow slavery in states that want slavery.

<h3>What were the arguments for Missouri Statehood?</h3>

Missouri wanted to gain admission into the Union as a slave state and the North did not want this because they were against slavery spreading to other parts of the Union.

Southerners on the other hand, wanted slavery in Missouri as they believed that it would increase the power of slave states in Congress. They therefore argued that territories such as Missouri that wanted slavery, should be free to have slavery.

Find out more on Missouri Statehood at brainly.com/question/1855671.

3 0

2 years ago